Hi Tim, I looked into it and we used to sort a variety of influenza virus that was described in literature as among the smallest bacteria, 200-300 nanometers. And yes we triggered off Log side scatter. We used a VantageSE DiVa beta version to do it and used Biosure (Grass Valley, CA) as a supplier of Sheath Fluid, it comes as a concentrated stock and has negligible granularity. What instrument(s) do you have? Though use of an ultracentrifuge is an option, I feel that the small volumes produced per spin aren't realistic for generation of large amounts of sheath fluid. I'm not sure which model of ultra-fuge you've got, but ours holds 8 or 12 (can't remember) 50mL Falcons. We spin 2 hours for DNA...so I'm not sure how long you would need to spin to get rid of 'space dust'. I assumed that you would be using more than one Biotin molecule per particle to detect your Alexa Dye. If there is not biotin per particle, you could also use an amplification system where you use naked streptavidin to bind to the biotin molecules, and then come back with anti-avidin, and then a biotin conjugated fluorochrome. I believe this is how I did it but it seems a long time ago. You can repeat this step again although steric hindrance may become a problem. I this kind of system (although I'm sure I wasn't the first) for detecting pictogram amounts of cytokines in ELISAs. Here is the reference: O'Connor, E., E.D. Roberts, and J.D. Davies. 1999. Amplification of cytokine specific ELISAs increases the sensitivity of detection to 5-20 picograms per milliliter. Journal of Immunological Methods. 229: 155-160. Though not exactly the same concept, it could be useful for you. Good luck! Let me know if I can offer any more help. 'The simplest approach is the best one' Eric O'Connor Head of Flow Cytometry MRC Clinical Sciences Centre Imperial College Faculty of Medicine Hammersmith Hospital Campus DuCane Road, London W12 0NN Tel: +44(0) 208 383 8330 Mobile: +44(0) 781 575 7730 ________________________________ From: Mario Roederer [mailto:roederer@drmr.com] Sent: 27 June 2008 01:23 To: cyto-inbox Subject: Re: Particle sorting request That's a trick question. If you want to know the proportion of beads with any amount of SA attached, the answer is no -- a single SA conjugated to Ax568 can't be detected by standard FACS. If you are trying to distinguish beads that have a good number of SA attached (say, 100-300) from blank beads, the answer will be "maybe". That depends on whether you can reliably detect 200 nm particles by scatter -- the answer is most probably not, but you can try (use log-side scatter as a trigger). If the beads are sufficiently coated with SA, then you can trigger on the Ax568 fluorescence, and enumerate the positive beads. If all beads are intrinsically fluorescent or labeled (say with Ax488) then you could trigger on Ax488 and count the ones that also have Ax568 vs. those that have no Ax568 fluorescence. Years ago, we use to analyze subcellular organelles by FACS, using log-scatter as a threshold (you really need to use sheath fluid that has been ultracentrifuged), or triggered on nile-red fluorescence (NR goes into membranes) and quantify the other fluorescences... the organelles were clearly in the sub-micron range, but it's hard to know how small they got. Sorting is trivial if you can detect them. mr On Jun 26, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Timothy Overton wrote: Dear All, I just has a request from someone working in my department which I think is theoretically possible, but I wondered if anyone has tried anything like it. They have nanoparticles coated in biotin, to which are attached Streptavidin conjugated to Alexa 568. The size of the particles is around 200 nm across. They asked whether flow cytometry could be used to determine the proportion of particles with Strep-Alexa attached, and then if they could be sorted. Has anyone done anything like this? Thanks, Tim ***************************************** Dr Tim Overton Lecturer in Biochemical Engineering School of Chemical Engineering The University of Birmingham Birmingham B15 2TT t: +44 (0) 121 414 5306 e: t.w.overton@bham.ac.ukReceived on Mon Jun 30 15:20:09 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST