Hi Jacob, It may not be an issue of the cells sticking to other cells, but rather an issue of dead cells and red cells falling below your FCS threshold which means that the sorter is basically blind to their presence. Upon reanalysis, they happen to fall above the threshold and you detect them as negative events. While your users worry about decreasing their yield due to extra manipulation, they are probably seriously decreasing their yield due to the presence of these negative events. These negative events (those that fall above the threshold on the sorting pass through the XDP) will cause an increase in the number of software aborts which will decrease the number of desired events that are sorted. The more unnecessary negative events then the greater this effect. Decreasing the threshold level to visualize these cells and then gating them out will not minimize this software abort effect, in fact it will increase it as you are detecting even more unwanted events in close proximity to your desired cells in your droplet queue which leads to software aborts. The XDP has the ability to collect the software aborts into a separate tube while sorting in purity mode, so you could try collecting the software aborts and resorting them after the first sort. The abort collection tube should have about 60% purity after the first sort which will minimize the software abort problem on the second pass through the sorter. Karen Helm University of Colorado Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Core ________________________________ From: Blair, Jacob Roberts [mailto:BlairJR@health.missouri.edu] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 4:26 PM To: cyto-inbox Subject: rbcs and dead cells in post sort samples Hi everyone, We have a few customers who bring samples that contain a lot of dead cells and red blood cells. The customers prefer not to lyse the rbcs or put their cells through a gradient to remove the dead cells and debris. They worry about decreasing the yield with the extra manipulation. We think that the rbcs and dead cells are sticking to our live cells and are sorted along with the population (giving us a lower purity). Depending on the downstream application, the contaminating rbcs/dead cells may negatively impact the results. Does anyone have suggestions of ways to increase the purity without changes in sample prep? We are having a difficult time excluding them with any kind of doublet gating using a MoFlo XDP. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Jacob R. Blair Research Specialist Cell & Immunobiology Core University of Missouri, Columbia One Hospital Drive, M324 MSB Columbia, MO 65212 Phone: (573) 884-7315 Fax: (573) 884-0665 Email: blairjr@health.missouri.edu <mailto:blairjr@health.missouri.edu> Web: www.biotech.missouri.edu/cic <http://www.biotech.missouri.edu/cic>Received on Wed Jun 25 14:58:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST