Hi Ralph... The 532 nm laser will excite all but the longest of the red FPs (like mPlum) reasonably well, but is particularly good for the shorter wavelength red proteins, like mOrange, DsRed and dTomato. We get better excitation of the longer red FPs (mStrawberry, mCherry, mPlum, mKate and Katushka) with 561 and 580 nm sources. 532 nm lasers suitable for flow are available at power levels at least up to 150 mW. In our hands, fluorescent protein s/n sensitivity does increase with higher power levels - but our 50 mW 532 nm module has certainly been adequate for most detection tasks. 561 nm lasers are now available up to 100 mW, and our 580 nm laser (MPBC, Canada) peaks at over 200 mW, although we usually run it at 50 mW on our LSR II, and never more than 100 mW. Take care, Bill Telford NCI-NIH -----Original Message----- From: Rossi Ralph [mailto:ralph.rossi@petermac.org] Sent: Tue 4/29/2008 2:20 AM To: cyto-inbox Subject: green laser suitability Dear all, does anyone have any recommendations/experience using ,green, 532nm lasers for excitation of the various "fruit" (RFP variants: cherry ,tomato, etc) report proteins. The maximum power available( that I can find ) for one of these lasers is 50 mw , I would think this is adequate, is it ? thanks ralph Regards Ralph Rossi Flow Facility Manager Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne , Australia Email: ralph.rossi@petermac.org Ph 96563747 , 96561955 This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only to be read or used by the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, distribution, disclosure or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this email (including any attachments) are not waived or lost by reason of its mistaken delivery to you. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify us immediately by telephone or email. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre provides no guarantee that this transmission is free of virus or that it has not been intercepted or altered and will not be liable for any delay in its receipt.Received on Wed Apr 30 13:58:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST