Saving raw FCS files on a server isn't probably going to do a lot of good two years from now unless you do a good job tracking the meta data about the FCS files and the experiments they represent. You could probably parse some of this information users will need to find the files they want from the FCS header, assuming users are putting the information they need there in a controlled fashion, but I would advocate a more standardized approach. Depending on your needs, maybe something like the Free/Open Source Flow Cytometry Laboratory Management System (flowLIMS) would be of interest. http://bioinformatics.fccc.edu/software/OpenSource/flowLIMS/flowlims.sht ml It may also not be the case of "if you build it they will come". In my experience, researchers tend to resist any extra work in annotating their data to ease later retrieval, even if it could make their lives (and their bosses lives) easier down the road in case they do need to look at data from a critical experiment again and the original samples are gone so can't be re-run. Unless there is buy-in from PIs from the labs to enforce compliance, the best intentions of the IT users group won't mean anything to the biologists that just want to get on with their experiments. Best, Ryan Ryan Brinkman, PhD Terry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre Assistant Professor, Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia 675 West 10th Avenue Vancouver, BC V5Z ALL Tel: (604) 675-8132 http://www.terryfoxlab.ca/ From: Robert Wadley [mailto:rbwadley@hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 11:59 PM To: cyto-inbox Subject: Archiving .fcs Data Dear Flow-ers, I have been asked to gather a consensus about what to do with data. I have always preferred to say it is the responsibility of the user to save & store/archive their own data. However, the IT users group here are suggesting that there should be some sort of formal archiving. I am currently working with my IT department to create a Cytometry mini-server. All the data generated from the Calibur, LSR II, Aria, Fluostar, Confocal, and the fluorescent microscope would be saved to the server. and the server would be backed up at regular intervals. User's would then extract their data from the server for saving, analysis or other manipulation. Presumably any archiving would be via the mini-server too. What do other research labs do? I know many have a similar approach to me - its all up to the user. One lab I visited simply trashed data when their drives were full, automatically assuming the users had backed-up. This is probably a little too harsh!! Regards Rob Wadley Cytometry & imaging Suite MMRI Brisbane. Australia ________________________________ Find out: SEEK Salary Centre Are you paid what you're worth? <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Eseek%2Ecom%2E au%2Fcareer%2Dresources%2Fsalary%2Dcentre%2F%3Ftracking%3Dsk%3Ahet%3Asc% 3Anine%3A0%3Ahot%3Atext&_t=764565661&_r=OCT07_endtext_salary&_m=EXT>Received on Tue Apr 29 17:15:38 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST