What about using the Coherent Connection software to attenuate the laser to 25mW in the new instrument to match the old instrument. Of course, that requires a Cube model laser, but I believe that is what BD is putting into the LSRII by default. Seems like a simple solution. -Christopher Bare Rockefeller University Flow Cytometry Resource Center _____ From: Telford, William (NIH/NCI) [E] [mailto:telfordw@mail.nih.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:45 PM To: cyto-inbox Subject: RE: 50 mW violet laser Hi Dave. Violet lasers diodes in the 50 mW range have been around for a couple of years now - they should be at least as reliable as the earlier units. Several manufacturers have ~100 mW units too. In our experience, having additional power in the violet is a good thing. A 25 mW unit will work fine for most immunophenotyping applications and viability (i.e. Cascade Blue, Pacific Blue, Live Dead Violet, etc.). For bright labeling, you may not see much practical difference between 25 and 50 mW. However, having more power should allow better discrimination of weaker surface labeling from background. Having more power definitely benefits fluorescent protein detection like eCFP, Cerulean, etc., especially if you are using these probes as FRET donors. We see a noticeable difference in eCFP s/n ratio as we move up in power. I think this is why the cytometer manufacturers have made the more powerful unit a standard item. I think the cost difference between 25 and 50 mW units is pretty small now, too. Enjoy, Bill _____ From: Dunaway, Dave [mailto:Dave.Dunaway@nationwidechildrens.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 10:07 AM To: cyto-inbox Subject: 50 mW violet laser Flowmeisters, In an effort to create redundancy across a couple of our LSR II's we are looking at the addition of a 405 violet laser to one that lacks such. One of the machines that does have a violet laser has a Coherent 25 mW. In a quote the we received from BD they specified a 50 mW laser. When asked about the fact that we wanted the 25 mW version the response we received was that they weren't sure if they still offered a 25 mW version. That aside, this situation has raised a couple of questions that I am hoping someone on the listserve could address. Our rationale for wanting the 25 mW rather than the 50 is that higher power of the 50 will create a greater difference in signals generated, thereby moving away from our goal of redundancy across machines. While no two machines will ever be exactly the same, and proper controls and data analysis would be paramount we want to be prepared to allow our users to switch between machines in the hopefully rare case of there being no other choice. In your opinion does the use of a 50 vs a 25 create more potential disparity than both machines having 25's? Secondly, does anyone out there have experience with the 50 mW laser? Is it more problem prone? I guess the general question would be what are the pluses and minuses both in terms of performance and reliability with regard to the stronger laser? Thanks in advance for your input. Dave David Dunaway Flow Cytometry Core Laboratory The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital 700 Children's Drive Columbus, Ohio 43205 (phone) 614-355-2820 Dave.Dunaway@nationwidechildrens.org _____ ----------------------------------------- Confidentiality Notice: The following mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. The recipient is responsible to maintain the confidentiality of this information and to use the information only for authorized purposes. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying, printing, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.Received on Fri Apr 18 15:38:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST