Hi everybbody, recently we have been sorting CD34Fitc positive CD38PerCPCY5.5 negative BM cells on a MoFlo. This population although correct in number of recovered cells shows no enrichment whatsoever on reanalysis. This population is part of a 4-way sort. The other 3 populations when reanalysed have purities above 95%. (Total colours = 6) We switched to using PE-CY5 instead of PerCP5.5. and saw the same problem. Using exactly the same voltage and compensation settings we did a 4-way sort with beads and got 100% purities on all populations...which rules out malfunction of the instrument. We reverted back to labelling the CD38 with Fitc and CD34 on PE and found that the purities were back to normal i.e. above 90%. Has anyone come across a similar problem with tandem conjugates? I am reluctant to say that aCD38 cannot be used with a tandem conjugate label and would greatly appreciate any plausible explanation for this phenomenon. We are very much aware of the instability of tandem conjugates and the circumstances that exacerbate this, the tandems mentioned are purchased from Beckman Coulter - as are most of the tandems we work with and on the whole our experience with them is good. regards AnnReceived on Mon Apr 7 14:18:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST