In principle, I agree. However: It would be fairly straight-forward to develop apoptosis assays for adherent cell lines, provided that ample QC were done to characterize the "damage" done by adherent cell harvesting. In my experience, many adherent cell lines lend themselves well to apoptosis assays by flow, provided that care is taken in the harvesting protocol. If the harvesting is done properly (for many, NOT ALL adherent cell lines), then the impact on the quantification, etc., of apoptotic cells is minimal. If this involves using non-flow based instruments/techniques, well, that's just good science. Many assays have "evolved" past the point of needing PCR, western blot, etc., to corroborate their results, but backing up flow data with images and/or molecular or other data is essential to successfully using flow assays in research and publishing. Many scientists who bring samples to a flow facility would be surprised at how much information can be gleaned from simply taking a brightfield picture of their cells. Andrew Andrew Beernink Senior Applications Specialist Beckman Coulter (858) 353-7007 (858) 435-1137 efax -----Original Message----- From: Elena Holden [mailto:EHolden@compucyte.com] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:56 PM To: cyto-inbox Subject: RE: Annexin V/Propidium Iodide Staining for Adherent Cells Hi Brandon, It is well known that removal of adherent cells for (flow) analysis creates all kinds of sample integrity problems therefore it is highly advisable to analyze adherent cell lines in their native environment. There are a number of options available (or more correctly can be available) to you other that flow techniques (solid phase CCD based systems, laser and PMT-based systems). They all have their Pros and Cons but definitely are worth considering when planning an adherent cell experiment. I am particularly biased towards LSC (laser scanning cytometry technology) because a) I represent CompuCyte as a commercial entity; b) most importantly, performance characteristics of the LSC systems match those of flow cytometry instrumentation in terms of precision, dynamic range and sensitivity with identical data presentation but allow to simultaneously produce excellent image data on SOLID phase specimens (adherent cells and tissues). More specific references relevant to Annexin 5 staining and/ or LSC technology are provided below: 1. The DNA of Annexin V-binding Apoptotic Cells Is Highly Fragmented, Zsolt Bacsó, Richard B. Everson and James F. Eliason, Cancer Research 60, 4623-4628, August 15, 2000 2. http://www.compucyte.com/pubapoptosis.htm 3. J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 37, 39075-39084, September 10, 2004 Elena Holden, CompuCyte Corporation www.compucyte.com -----Original Message----- From: Tavshanjian, Brandon [mailto:Brandon.Tavshanjian@ucsf.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 5:35 PM To: cyto-inbox Subject: Annexin V/Propidium Iodide Staining for Adherent Cells Our lab has used a protocol for FITC-annexin V/PI staining to look at induction of apoptosis by flow which seems to work quite well in suspension BaF3 cells. I'd like to use this technique in adherent cells (MCF7,MCF10A, other mammary epithelial cell lines), however, I've heard there are some issues with applying this technique to adherent cells (namely, that the cell detachment procedure may cause false-positive staining by annexin V). I was wondering if anyone has a protocol like this that they've successfully used for adherent cells? ------------------------------------------------------ Brandon Tavshanjian UCSF Chemistry and Chemical Biology Shokat Lab, Genentech Hall N-528 (415) 514-4111Received on Tue Feb 12 14:38:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST