Blocking Fc receptors - summary

From: Uriel TK <utk@netvision.net.il>
Date: Wed Feb 06 2008 - 06:35:25 EST
Friends:
As always, your input was very helpful and insightful. Thanks to all who answered. Here's a compilation of the responses.

We discussed the results and decided to use the mouse gamma globulin from Jackson. Based on the responses we are pretty sure that human would work as well as murine, but the reasons for murine were: 1) that it is nonetheless the "common practice" in the protocol books 2) although the risks for infectious agents is remote with the commercial human gamma globulin, it is even better if it is zero. Obtaining human serum from non-commercial sources (like the blood bank) can carry some risk, and would require general precautions similar to handling blood products 3) although human globulins would better bind the FcRs, if the murine mAbs we use for staining do bind FcRs at their low concentration, then gamma globulin we'd add at high concentration should outcompete them in any case.

Best regards,

Uriel.

--
Uriel Trahtemberg, M.Sc.
MD/PhD student
The Laboratory for Cellular and Molecular Immunology
The Hebrew University - Hadassah Medical Organization
Jerusalem - ISRAEL



Hi Uriel,

 Why not use a mixture of both?  Shouldn’t hurt, but you’re really trying to block the nonspecific mouse Fabs binding with the human FcRs.  Even whole serum should work.

----------------------------------------------

Hi Uriel –

I recommend blocking with murine Ig (plain mouse serum or the Jackson serum Ig cut you indicate will work and should cover all isotypes of antibodies).  You want to prevent non-specific binding of your “specific” murine antibodies.  Therefore, murine Ig would most closely mimic and block that binding.  This has been a long-standing “rule-of-thumb” in standard in immunology protocols – to block non-specific binding, incubate with serum from the same species as the antibody employed.  However, I’m looking forward to hearing from the community if this rule-of-thumb has been updated.

-----------------------------------------------

I use anti FcR from Miltenyi Biotech.It is reasonably priced and seems to work quite well.

-----------------------------------------------

The argument I have always gone with in this case is to try to use the same species of non-specific Ig as the cells you are staining, so as to have the most efficient binding to the relevant Fc receptors, and simply trust to bulk-action of a LOT of the non-specific Ig to cover any non-Fc effects. Unless you're analyzing someone who formerly worked as an animal tech but had to stop due to allergies (it does happen) you shouldn't have to worry about mouse-specific binding from a human sample…

Just my $0.02...

-----------------------------------------------

Use human Ig to block Fc receptors on human cells.  That will bind with best avidity.

-----------------------------------------------

An interesting question. 

I haven’t evaluated, but first thought would be that mouse blocking would work well; after all, that is exactly the binding that you need to block.  Further, there would be the least likelihood of mouse Ig blocking containing any anti-mouse reactivity against the mouse monoclonal reagents, whereas blocking with human IgG may contain some anti-mouse reactivity, as can be a problem in some immunoassays.  Jackson Labs has probably addressed this matter in one of their preps. (A caveat is if the mouse monoclonal reagent is of a class which makes up a small fraction of normal mouse serum Ig, and thus the blocking concentration is lower that expected.)  

One issue with mouse blocking, could be if the binding affinity of mouse blocking Ig is relatively low for human FcR receptors, in which case there could be some exchange between blocking mouse Ig and labeled mouse monoclonal reagents.  If so, this might be overcome by higher concentration of unlabelled blocking mouse Ig.

-------------------------------------------------------

We have tried both and both work under optimized conditions.   We have settled on mouse sera, not Ig fraction.  We purchase sera from Chemicon[Millipore] and do a high speed spin to remove junk.   We then dilute in half with the same buffer we use to dilute our antibodies, sterile filter, and store in sterile LN2 tubes in aliquots large enough for 1 day.   We use 5 uL per million cells.   The use of mouse avoids the issues of human derived reagents [viruses, etc.] and is likely more effective to block mouse reagents.
-------------------------------------------
 Hello,

 you would be using Human IgG for iv therapy which is commonly sold as 
50mg IgG per ml. This solution is sterile, stable (store at 4°C!!; no
(!) freezing) for prolonged periods, tested for infectious agents and
rather inexpensive (considering how long a vial will last). You may ask
the manufacturer also for lots that have just expired and cannot be
used for therapy any more. This is usually given away free and as good
as the "real thing".

 For use, make stock solutions by diluting with your preferred wash IF
wash buffer to 10mg/IgG per ml. This stock may be stored frozen. 

 For blocking, use one drop (!) per assay before adding the test
antibody. If you prefer exact dosage take 20ul (but only difference
being that it takes more time). No preincubation or washing required.
Just mix.

 Same approach with indirect immunofluorescence - BUT in such case your
second step reagents MUST be absorbed with human IgG.

 This protocol works with almost any species. It fails in extremely (!)
rare instances when one encounters cells carrying IgM-Fc Receptors
where you need human IgM for blockage.

 Hope this helps!

 With best wishes
-----------------------------------------------
I would think, that all things you suggest would work.
We find as best (and of course cheapest) solution, to block the human cells
with mouse serum. We can get it from our animal facility for free or make it
ourselfs (Old mice and mice with wrong genotype are always available).
Mouse serum contains a lot of unlabeled IgG, which should block all kind of
unwanted binding sites on your cells (not only Fc-receptors).
If you use solely mouse mAb, than only mouse antibodies carry your dyes and
therefore can contribute to your background.

In our hands, this worked fine.

Happy blocking

PS: We used about 5-10% mouse serum in PBS and block 10-15 min at 4°C (on
ice, to be more correct).
---------------------------------------------------
Back in the old days we always used expired human AB serum from the blood
bank.
We couldn't use mouse serum even if we had any because we were doing indirect
staining. Presumably human Ig would fit the Fc receptors better than mouse
which would make it more effective. You do of course have to heat inactivate it
to prevent complement lysis of the bound cells. 60 degrees C for 30 mins. We
would then filter though a syringe filter and freeze it. We preincubated  with
5% serum for 15mins before adding the antibodies. Seemed to work pretty well.

Best
Received on Thu Feb 7 17:58:00 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST