Janet Dow wrote: > We are wanting to add a 405 nm violet laser to our LSR II and were > wondering if it is cheaper(or even possible) to do it without going thru > BD. We would obviously need to add some PMTs at the same time. > > I would love to hear from anyone who has done this without going thru BD > as well as those who used BD for the upgrade. > > I am interested in cost and how hard/easy this would be to do myself. I > am quite good at working on our Calibur and Scan as well as my MoFlo. > In my experience, it is a lot easier to build a flow cytometer from scratch than it is to make significant modifications to a commercial instrument. This definitely applies to one as complex as an LSR II. You will not only need the laser, you will also the fiber optic and lens that direct light to the flow cell, and all the mounting hardware. You will not only need the PMTs, mounts, etc., you will also need a trigon or octagon and the relatively nonstandard filters and other optics that go with it, plus some nontrivial electronics (I may be wrong, but I wouldn't imagine the LSR came with electronics for PMTs that didn't ship with it). After you put the whole business together, you will then need to align the optics and tweak the electronics so you can get decent signals and make sense of them. I can add a laser and a couple of PMTs to a Cytomutt in a day or two because the Cytomutt is a) designed to make that relatively easy, b) made from modular parts that can either be bought off the shelf or made using a benchtop drill press and a hacksaw, and c) a lot less complicated than an LSR II. I wouldn't even attempt to play the game with an LSR II or an Aria; maybe on a MoFlo, but I'd be hesitant even there. Unless some competent third party decides to do retrofits for the fancier BD boxes, as Cytek has done for the Calibur, your only reasonable option, in my opinion, is to get the job done by BD. Flow cytometers are like yachts; if you have to worry about what it costs to get and keep them, you can't afford one. Sorry, -HowardReceived on Fri Jan 4 12:38:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST