Dear Users, I had a very fundamental question about quantification of flourescence data, as obtained by FACS v/s immunocytochmemistry (ICC) data as observed under the microscope. We have been doing staining of mammary epithelial cells with BrdU using protocols that we have standardised for both FACS and ICC using a secondary conjugated to FITC. With ICC, we count the number of green cells under the microscope as positive. With FACS, we get the number as given by the machine. In a one time experiment done parallely, we could not get the same positive cell count when compared between the 2 techniques. I am not sure if researchers always find the quantitaive FACS and ICC data the same? We work with primary human breast cancer cells. Hence cell number is our biggest limitation in all experiments. Therefore we have been majorly using ICC to count BrdU positivity. We wanted to test if the quantification we are doing using ICC is correct. Now, I am not sure if we can & should expect an exact corrrelation between numbers obtained with ICC and FACS. I would be very grateful and helped for any insight in this direction. Best wishes and wishing each of you a Very Happy New Year! DD ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Dec 23 16:58:00 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST