A couple of (perhaps) naďve questions: 7aad seems to have been around for ages and appears to give good separation of cells that are (apparently) live and dead. Yet, there seems a clear trend away from an old fashioned dye like 7aad to other products (eg the range of Mol Probes viability/vitality dyes). Is there something I'm missing about 7aad not doing the job? If the others are better than 7aad, can someone tell me why. Is it just the colours they are detected in, or something more than that? I want to use the best approach and happy to change from 7aad if need be, but don't want to change for change sake. Any advice? On a similar topic, we stain human PBMCs with 7aad in the antibody staining cocktail, then wash, then fix then run the samples. This gives us good separation of positive and negative peaks, which we take to indicate cells that were alive versus dead prior to fixation. Are we wrong to do this? I see lots of instances where people say things like 7aad or PI can't be used for fixed cells. Our approach seems too obvious for people to have missed, hence I'm wondering if there's something wrong with doing it that way. Anyone have any comments? Regards, Stuart Dr Stuart Berzins NHMRC RD Wright Fellow Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, AUSTRALIA. email: berzins@unimelb.edu.au Ph (office): +61-3-8344-5706 Ph (lab): +61-3-8344-5704 Fax: +61-3-9347-1540 Mobile: 0427 849 123Received on Thu Dec 13 13:28:52 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST