Re: vitriolic analyzer service

From: Alice L. Givan <Alice.L.Givan@dartmouth.edu>
Date: Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:14:39 EST
 To answer Akos,
I believe the reason that the instrument representatives do not respond to the negative
and positive comments on the mailing list is that "we" have made it clear that we do not
want the list to serve as a base for advertising.  There is a fine line between defending
your company's instruments and advertising those instruments.  I agree that it would be
good to hear a response from BD.  And it would be especially good,  because the various
instrument vendors can get hammered on this list and perhaps they should have the right
to defend themselves! 

I must say that I commend the vendors for the amount of self-control that they use.  Can
we figure out a way to let them in on the discussion?

Alice

Alice L. Givan
Dartmouth Medical School
Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
tel 603-650-7661
fax 603-650-6130
givan@dartmouth.edu
www.dartmouth.edu/~celllab
Received on Wed Nov 28 12:18:00 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST