Hi Mike, It would seem from your cut and paste that the people have already bought the stuff so take Janos's advice and suck it and see (though it's very much like the cy3/cy5 pairing and should work fine). If it doesn't work, get them to consult you during their planning stage (I refrained from using quotes around "planning", but not for long). You don't really go into much detail about what lines you have available other than 514 (I'm guessing you've got a 633, 635 or 647 in there too though, so you can measure the acceptor fluorescence), but there might be some better combination for your set-up, and it would be better for all of you if your punters found out from you which dyes you could excite, before they worked out which ones they'd impose on you, along the lines of... "I want to observe FRET between conjugated antibodies. Which donor and acceptor fluorochrome will work best on your Vantage or Aria ?" Cheers Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: Janos, Szollosi To: Cytometry Mailing List Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:51 AM Subject: Re: FRET on Alexa Stained Antibodies Dear Michael, I have not use this experimental setup, because we do not have the 514 excitation option (instead we have 532 nm, which is better). However this combination might work, although the 514 excitation is not optimal for Alexa 555. Both Alexa 546 and 555 have a shoulder around 514 nm, so they can be excited there. Alexa 546 is more sensitive to bleaching than Alexa 555, in addition Alexa 555 have higher absorption coefficient. So probably Alexa 555 is a better choice. But unfortunately you should do the experiments to see how it works! Good luck Janos At 02:55 PM 4/24/2007, you wrote: Hello All, A researcher in our institute would like to observe FRET in the following way. I want to observe FRET between conjugated antibodies. The donor fluorochrome being Alexa 555 and the acceptor fluorochrome Alexa 647. Therefore would need to excite the Alexa 555 and observe emission from the Alexa 647. We have a FACSAria and a FACSVantage with the possibility of 514 excitation. Has anyone done anything similar or can you help as to how this can be achieved. Mike Hughes, Flow Cytometry, PICR, Manchester, UK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the person(s) ('the intended recipient') to whom it was addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Paterson Institute for Cancer Research or the University of Manchester. It may contain information that is privileged & confidential within the meaning of applicable law. Accordingly any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message, or any of its contents, by any person other than the intended recipient may constitute a breach of civil or criminal law and is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail as soon as possible. Janos Szollosi Department of Biophysics and Cell Biology Faculty of Medicine Medical and Health Science Center University of Debrecen Mailing address: H-4012 P.O.Box 39, Debrecen Street address: H-4032 Egyetem square 1, Life Sciences Building, Debrecen Hungary Phone: (36) 52) 423-331 Phone/Fax: (36) (52) 412-623, Cellphone: + (36) 30 303 3894 E-mail: szollo@dote.huReceived on Wed May 2 12:18:00 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST