Hi Ray It helps to embed multiple pictures into one word document to make it a bit easier to compare them. It looks to me as if you sort the cells on the right side of a normal noise distribution. The noise here is partially down to compensation probably including an offset? I would expect them to come back in the middle of the Gaussian population. Pity the PE only or FITC only stain do not exist. Regards Gerhard > -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Hester [mailto:rhester@jaguar1.usouthal.edu] > Sent: 01 December 2006 15:54 > To: Cytometry Mailing List > Subject: Sort purity query > > > Hi, > > An investigator brought two samples to the lab - one control > (unstained > cells - '59601.jpeg') and a two color sample > ('unsorted.jpeg'). Yes, I > know, unstained cells aren't the best control, but please > overlook that > for the moment. > > In the attached dot plot ("unsorted"), three regions of > interest to sort > were identified by the investigator: P2 ('double-stained'), > P3 (bright > PE stained), and P4 (dim PE stained). > > We did this as a two way sort. First, sorting P2-gated > cells into the > left tube and P3-gated cells into the right tube. After a period of > time, we stopped sorting P2 cells and switched to sorting > P4-gated cells > into the left tube. > > Re-analysis of sorted populations seemed to indicate the P3- and > P4-gated sorts had worked reasonably well, but the P2 sorted cells > seemed to resemble more the unsorted population. > > Could the apparent, poor P2 sort purity result from bleaching of the > FITC on these double-stained cells - especially in light of the fact > that the PE-stained and sorted populations seemd to fall more closely > within their sort gates? Our 100 mW argon is in the shop again so we > are using a Coherent Spectrum 70C laser at 150 mW for excitation of > these two colors and maybe that's too much intensity for FITC > under the > staining conditions of this sample...? > > Any thoughts would be appreciated. > > Ray Hester > Univ of South Alabama > > > >Received on Tue Dec 5 12:38:00 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 06 2006 - 03:12:07 EST