Re: A very stupid question on the Fluorescence

From: Mark Simmerson <Mark.Simmerson@sch.nhs.uk>
Date: Mon Oct 30 2006 - 15:49:31 EST
Interesting
Being a fan of words I wonder if the piece you quote is not quite right.
If one combines the prefix
fluo : to flow, pour, stream. 
with 
escence - to become
Then perhaps
Fluorescence - to begin stream/pour light.
Just a thought
Any other etymologists out there or are flow-ers more likely to be insects?
Mark

>>> Leonid Volkov <leonid.volkov@chus.qc.ca> 10/27/06 10:22 pm >>>
Dear All,

I would like to add in my lecture just a little explanation of the term 
«Fluorescence».
But I can’t understand the etymology.
Dr. G. Stokes described the phenomenon.
And he invented the term.
- escence - means "to become" in Latin.
- Fluor  - comes from the Fluorite (fluorspar), the mineral used by Dr. 
Stokes in his work.
But what means the term?
Become like Fluorite?
Certainly Sir George Gabriel Stokes had a perfect knowledge of Latin, 
but not me.
Maybe someone knows the response or can find it effortlessly in the 
original publication (but not in the Google.com) of 1852?

Thank at advance.

L. VOLKOV , Ph. D; M. D.
Asst. en Cytometrie -Microscopie

loc. 4867
Service commun de cytométrie et de microscopie
Centre de recherches cliniques
3001, 12 av.Nord SHERBROOKE
Quebec, CANADA
		   J1H 5N4
	Tel: (819) 346-1110 ext 1-4867
	Fax: (819) 564-5215
Leonid Volkov <leonid.volkov@chus.qc.ca>
Received on Tue Oct 31 13:18:01 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 07 2006 - 03:12:06 EST