Help! I have an investigator trying to do Annexin V staining and they are getting some strange results. I tried doing a search on this list and found an awful lot about the protocol, but not the strange results they are getting. I have attached a Power Point with two different samples (untreated and treated). When we load the sample, the Annexin V - FITC peak starts out about 1500 stays there momentarily, then rapidly moves up the scale to a peak around 11,000 then levels off. If we load the sample, wait about 1 minute, then record, the peak stays steady at the higher level. Also, we observed if we loaded the sample, recorded (and got the changing signal) but did not unload the tube, started acquisition again - the signal was at the higher level and stayed steady (leading me to believe there is a pressurization issue.) The 7-AAD signal stayed relatively steady whichever way we recorded. After the recent discussion on the list, I did turn the agitation off (temperature was off also) and there was no change. We are doing this experiment on a FACSAria. We ran several different samples with several different types and time-points of treatment with the same results. Questions: 1) What is causing the Annexin signal to rise? 2) We are also trying to test spleen cells for apoptosis (and getting very similar results). We do a quick cold water lyse to get rid of the red cells. Should this cause any problems for Annexin staining? Any other lyse options that are better or worse for this protocol? 3) We are getting fairly high percentages of cells in apoptosis in our untreated groups. Any suggestions? 4) Is the age of the buffer or Annexin reagent critical? After a careful review with the technician, I found that they are staining in a higher volume of buffer than recommended. They are staining 200,000 cells in 200 ul of buffer. They then add 5 ul of the Annexin - FITC, incubate for 15 minutes in the dark, add 300 ul of buffer, then add 5 ul of 7-AAD and incubate another 10 minutes. According the the Pharmingen protocol they should be staining in 100 ul buffer, adding the Annexin and 7-AAD at the same time, incubating 15 minutes, then adding 400 ul of buffer. Although I think they need to address these differences, I really don't think they are contributing to the phenomenon we are seeing. I would appreciate any insight you can give me! Thanks so much in advance. Pam Shaw Fluorescence Cytometry Core Facilitator Center for Environmental Health Sciences The University of Montana 32 Campus Dr, Skaggs Building 052 Missoula, MT 59812 Ph (406) 243-4974 email: <mailto:pamela.shaw@umontana.edu> pamela.shaw@umontana.edu www.umt.edu/cehs <http://www.umt.edu/cehs/FluorCytomCore.htm> /FluorCytomCore.htm This attachment - 'Annexin V.ppt' - 148.48 KBytes - can be viewed at http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/MD-parts/aa7e26782203e8d84f4756c616465e368efbfde6.pptReceived on Fri Oct 6 11:38:00 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 11 2006 - 03:12:04 EDT