Dear Joern, Apparently it only went out to you. Re how it was validated. I'm not really sure. I wasn't involved in the whole risk assessment exercise we went through as I was only a Research Assistant at that time, but we were told to use bleach to clean the benches or (not sure about the exact conc here) 10 min 4M Hydrochloric acid for re-useable scalpels and plasticware. And that was in relation to potential BSE containing cow brain material (which is potentially infectious to human and handled in a 2b Hazard environment). Also coveralls and such were autoclaved twice for 30min at 121 degree Celsius before put in the normal waste. The hazard for non-BSE material such as moose and elk is much lower, but on the other hand I do subscribe to "better safe than sorry". Not sure if it has to be undiluted bleach - I guess that's not too good for the lines in a FACS machine. Petra -----Original Message----- From: Joern Schmitz [mailto:jschmitz@bidmc.harvard.edu] Sent: 17 September 2006 03:20 To: cyto-inbox Cc: 'Cytometry Mailing List' Subject: RE: A big thank you on biosafety Dear Petra, I don't know whether your response came only to me or really went out to everybody in the flow Cytometry group. Just to comment on your e-mail: I think all of this is a very healthy and urgently needed discussion to ensure all cell sorter operators are reasonably well protected when they perform cell sorts of potentially biohazardous specimens. When I read your comment at the bottom of your e-mail: "put some undiluted bleach on it" a number of questions come up. Just to list a few: 1. How has that been validated? 2. Do we truly need to use undiluted bleach? For how much time? As I am not directly working in this field (however oversee a flow cytometry facility that sorts AIDS virus-infected nonfixed human and non-human primate specimens), I leave the rest of the discussion to the experts in this field. Regards, Joern Joern E. Schmitz, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Division of Viral Pathogenesis Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Research East 213D 41 Avenue Louis Pasteur Boston, MA 02115 Phone: 617-667-5206 Fax: 617-667-8210 http://bidmc.harvard.edu/display.asp?leaf_id=4102 http://www.hms.harvard.edu/aids/programs/cfar/cores/immflowlma.htm This document may contain information that is privileged, CONFIDENTIAL and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately, as the use of this information is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: Disterer, Petra (Medsch Hampstead/Medicine) [mailto:p.disterer@medsch.ucl.ac.uk] Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 6:20 AM To: cyto-inbox Subject: RE: A big thank you on biosafety Dear Flowers, Having worked with Prions for three years, I think I should put my two cents in. There is no evidence at all that TSE from elk or moose is transmissable to human. On the other hand there is considerable evidence that cross-species TSE infection is extremely difficult, for example infecting mice requires high-dose administration of pure beta sheet prion protein directly to the brain and passaging into other mice. Scrapie also is impossible to transmit to human and it's been around for hundreds of years, so we really would know by now. So basically I would estimate the risk to be very low. For safety precaution I would see if the cells could be fixed before sorting and avoid aerosol formation as you would with any potentially infectious sample, but I'm just suggesting that for your peace of mind. I as the researcher working with those cells would not take any precautions beyond what I would usually with all tissue culture. I'm assuming here that with "material" you meant cells and not purified prion protein. I don't think you could FACS that, as the sizes wouldn't be big enough. Again for line purification - you'd be coping with cells that potentially contain prion protein not free concentrated prion protein, so I think that cleaning according to what you normally do for potentially infectious cells would be adequate. Just to mention, prion protein (the normal alpha helical form and potentially some misfolded forms) are present in quite a few cells which you've probably already sorted, such as central nervous sytem neuronal cells or Purkinje cells. I think we as scientists should be careful about subscribing to the media induced panic about prion protein. (Ie prion protein is not practically indestructable - put some undiluted bleach on it and that'll do fine). Hope that helps Petra Disterer The UCL Inst.of Hepatology -----Original Message----- From: Joern Schmitz [mailto:jschmitz@bidmc.harvard.edu] Sent: Fri 08/09/2006 22:05 To: Cytometry Mailing List Cc: Subject: RE: A big thank you on biosafety I totally agree: The Institutional Biosafety Committee has to look at this. BTW: Who has decided that the biosafety level should "only" be BSL-2 when you are handling "bugs" that are basically indestructible? My gut feeling tells me that right now nobody really has any clue about any potential longterm effects of aerosols from these specimens that you are about to generate ... Joern E. Schmitz, MD -----Original Message----- From: Charles A Kuszynski [mailto:ckuszyns@UNMC.EDU] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 11:22 AM To: cyto-inbox Subject: Re: A big thank you on biosafety I would be more concerned about the potential for aerosol production and biosafety issues than whether you can clean the sample tube. Your institutional Biosafety Committee needs to look at this project and suggest the requirements for operator safety and containment. Charles A. Kuszynski, Ph.D. Hello, An investigator here has inquired about using the MoFlo for sorting prion infected material. This will be from deer and elk with chronic wasting disease, which is treated as BSL2, and may eventually also be scrapie, which I think is also BSL2. I was wondering if anyone out there has done these kinds of sorts, and if so, what sort of containment and line decontamination they have used? Thanks very much. Anne -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Sep 18 15:38:00 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 20 2006 - 03:12:03 EDT