Re: laser for dsRED mutant : Cherry

From: simon mccallum <sm571@hutchison-mrc.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Fri Sep 15 2006 - 12:44:51 EDT
Hi Mustafa

DsRed is about 4x brighter than m-Cherry, with around twice the excitation
efficiency at 488nm (~20 vs ~10%). If you have a water-cooled argon laser on
any of your sorters, you may have more luck at 514.5nm. Even with a 568nm
Krypton line, i¹ve never found the cherry/tangerine Œfruity mutants¹ to be
very bright either in e.coli or in eukaryotic lines. As for the MEFs, if
they fit through a 70um cell strainer filter, you should be fine.

Simon McCallum
MRC-Hutchison Research Centre
Cambridge, UK


On 11/9/06 21:24, "Mustafa Özbas" <oezbasm@ethz.ch> wrote:

> Dear Flowers,
> 
> previously, I used the MoFlo in our P3 security lab of our core facility with
> the 488nm laser to analyse dsRed on legionella bacteria. It was successful.
> 
> A customer of mine is planning to perform a FACS experiment :
> 
> Analyse a fluorescent (EGFP or Cherry (dsRED mutant, excitation around 590nm,
> emission 610nm) 
> The main goal is to determine the number of cells showing fluorescence under a
> certain set of conditions.
> The next steps would follow by sorting the right population.
> 
> The work is with Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) which are
> adherent cells. How easy is it to perform FACS in such a cell type?
> Would I have to consider special preparation procedures?
> 
> There is also an Aria or Altra available for sorting in normal conditions--B_3241187102_9325556--
Received on Mon Sep 18 13:38:00 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 19 2006 - 03:12:04 EDT