Nicholas Lejarcegui wrote (for a third party): >I was wondering if anyone had any experience with harvesting >bacteria from infected tissues for subsequent flow analysis? I'm >sure there's a way to do it, but before I jumped into a literature >search I thought I'd go to the folks who might know. A very old paper from BD (Mansour JD, Robson JA, Arndt CW, Schulte TH: Detection of Escherichia coli in blood using flow cytometry. Cytometry 6:186-190, 1985) describes the use of a proprietary lysing reagent containing detergents and enzymes (not otherwise specified) to get rid of all the cells in whole blood, enabling seeded E. coli to be detected at concentrations of 100/mL or less. Most cells in tissue don't have cell walls, as bacteria do, and enzymes such collagenase should get rid of a lot of the glue that holds soft tissues together, so the overall approach might work for at least some tissues, not likely for cartilage, bone, etc. You'd have to be careful if you wanted to keep the bacteria alive, and/or to detect surface antigens. If you wanted to used rRNA probes for identification, you'd probably be OK. If you're looking for a few bacteria per gram of tissue, you'll probably be better off doing the lysis and filtering through a black membrane or aluminum oxide filter and then doing image analysis instead of flow. -HowardReceived on Fri Mar 24 14:38:00 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 25 2006 - 03:12:02 EST