Hello Stuart, The negative control I would use is not unstained cells, but rather a parallel culture (or animal) unexposed to BrdU. Then permeabilize and stain as you do the stained sample. If you still see such a difference, there is indeed a problem. Good luck, Neal -- Neal Benson Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research University of Florida Stuart Berzins wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We want to analyse BRDU incorporation by FACS using anti-BRDU antibodies > to staining mouse lymphocytes. Although we are getting a clear positive > peak, the background staining of cells we know to be negative is very > high (2 logs higher) when compared to unstained cells. Advice from > colleagues is that this sort of thing is reasonably common and that we > shouldn't worry about high, or variable, backgrounds as long as the > positive peak is clear. This seems a little 'unscientific' and we'd > prefer to know what is going on and remedy the situation if possible. If > anyone has experience with anti-BRDU analysis by FACS and has solved or > knowingly avoided the problem of high background staining by anti-BRDU > antibodies, we'd love to hear from you. FYI, we are currently using a BD > anti-BRDU staining kit, but have encountered similar problems with > home-made buffers. > > Regards, > > StuartReceived on Wed Feb 8 13:58:00 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 09 2006 - 03:12:01 EST