Dear colleagues, We are determining CHO cell cycle kinetics using BrdU, FITC-conjugated anti-BrdU antibodies, and propidium iodide. We have had good luck with our bivariate analyses, but recently we suddenly have been unable to get clear and consistent results. Eliminating variables resulted in identification of a particular lot of antibody from a well-known vendor was not working as advertised. Instead of getting a nice "horseshoe" distribution for growing cells, we obtained a shift in all cells in the population to a brighter fluorescence in the FITC anti-BrdU channel almost to the level of S phase cells in past experiments (see below). Side by side comparison of this antibody to antibody from another vendor clearly indicated that the antibody from the first vendor was not functioning. Has anyone else had a similar experience and are there some vendors who have a problem with quality control? Sincerely, Kevin Sweder For the above figures: Upper left - 1:25 dilution of PRB-1 (anti-BrdU 1° Ab and Alexafluor 488-conjugated 2° Ab) Upper right - 1:50 dilution of PRB-1 (anti-BrdU 1° Ab and Alexafluor 488-conjugated 2° Ab) Lower left - 1:50 dilution of B44 (FITC-conjugated anti-BrdU 1° Ab) Lower right - 1:50 dilution of CD4 (FITC-conjugated anti-BrdU 1° Ab) All samples were from the same vehicle-treated CHO culture.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 14 2006 - 22:03:59 EST