> >I have usually only had the minimal number of plots on a worksheet >that I needed to ensure that the samples I was running looked >reasonable. > >Being a Friday morning, and having some time on my hands, I decided >to check out Ryan's comment about speeding up the display process by >reducing/removing plots. > >13 parameters 2e6 events collected 5 dot plot 4 >gates 500 events displayed refresh time 63 sec > >13 parameters 2e6 events collected 1 dot plot 0 >gates 500 events displayed refresh time 53 >sec >13 parameters 2e6 events collected 1 histogram 0 gates >500 events displayed refresh time 52 sec > >13 parameters 2e6 events collected 3 dot plots 2 >gates 500 events displayed refresh time 59 sec >13 parameters 2e6 events collected 3 dot plots 2 >gates 5000 events displayed refresh time 62 sec >13 parameters 2e6 events collected 3 dot plots 2 >gates 50000 events displayed refresh time 64 sec > >So, as Ryan suggests, decreasing the number of plots increases >refresh time, but the type of plot does not seem to matter as much. >Increasing the number of displayed events increases the > >I also wonder if the refresh can be affected by the 'worksheet' vs >'global worksheet'. > >Yours with a grain of salt on a Friday morning. > >Timothy Bushnell, Ph.D. >Director, CPBR Flow Lab >University of Rochester Does having compensation enabled/disabled make any difference? I was wondering if the processing required to apply compensation during display might be an additional factor increasing the display time... My IT technician has become very interesting in the DiVa software and is hopefully going to have a good look at where the bottleneck actually is (CPU? Memory? Hard drives?). Adrian Smith Centenary InstituteReceived on Mon Aug 15 14:18:01 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 14 2006 - 22:03:52 EST
