Hello friends! I was looking at mol. probe's Zenon stuff, and I was wondering whether that could be possible with normal 2ry Abs. If one was to use a purified primary antibody and a 2ry one (F(ab')2 or F(ab) from jackson for example), shouldn't it be possible to achieve the same as probe's product? All you need extra is "stock" IgG or a purified monoclonal to block the reaction. It would go as follows: 1)titrate your 1ry and 2ry as you'd normally do for a 2 step labeling (100 microL reaction vol) 2)Prepare 6 tubes with the amount of 1ry and 2ry determined in "1" but in a 50 microL volume, incubate, and then add 50 microL of serial dilutions of blocking IgG (to bind the left free 2ry). 3)label 6 samples of your cells with a different 1ry of the same isotype, wash, and then do a "2nd step" consisting of the 100 microL mixture obtained in "2". 4)run an experiment with unstained, normal 2ble stain, blocking IgG+2ry Ab (control for unspecific staining) and the 6 samples obtained in "3". If the amount of blocking IgG is too low, I'd expect to see an increase in fluorescence (in comparison to the normal stain) due to excess 2ry binding the "other" primary Ab. But if the blocking is good then the fluorescence should be quite close to the "normal" 2ble stain + extra background from unspecific IgG-2ry binding, which shouldn't be much. The molar ratios obtained should stay quite constant for all Abs of the same Fc and would be adjusted according to the amount of 1ry used. Thus you could prepare custom reagents with whatever color you have on your 2ry which is compatible with multiple labeling, even using primary Abs of the same host since the 1ry-2ry interaction is done for every component separately. This system would also save money and the QC of Jackson I understand is as good as mol. probe's. Instead of buying multiple conjugations of the same marker (or paying a lot for zenon) you only need the purified and you can pick your colors according to every experiment as needed and need not to worry about host species. This seems so simple that there must be a caveat somewhere, surely someone tried it in the past. I would very much like to hear (read) your comments on the subject. Thanks in advance, Regards, Uriel.Received on Wed Feb 23 13:58:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 14 2006 - 22:03:38 EST