Akos, I have to say we have fewer problems with DiVa version4.0 than we had previously. For one thing, we no longer lose data which is a step forward. We do still experience the occasional "freeze" and if our experiments are too big it takes a long time to close one experiment and open another. A "find experiment" can take up to 10 minutes, leading the impatient operator to assume the program has frozen and to do a hard exit and a full shutdown and restart. However the fact that the program is Java has nothing whatever to do with these performance issues. Java just happens to be the language used by the programmers. No-one has ever shown the machine code from a Java compilation to be grossly inferior to that from any other language. As for your error messages, Java is only reporting the errors that have arisen from programming mistakes. Don't kill the messenger. It may well be that the problems lie in the overall program design. It is my suspicion (of course we can all have our suspicions) that, in order to have everything accessible, the program attempts to keep too much in memory (hence the 2GB supplied in the standard hardware). I do think it is necessary to report such problems to BD. Their test environments cannot hope to duplicate the conditions extant in all working flow laboratories. Frank Battye. | | << The Cytometry Laboratory \__/ <<<< The Walter & Eliza Hall Institute ------!!<<<<<< 1G Royal Parade, Parkville /!!\ <<<< Victoria 3050, Australia o !! \ << ph: 61_3_9345 2541, fax: 61_3_9347 0852Received on Fri Oct 15 14:58:00 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 16 2004 - 03:12:04 EST