I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on why we are having trouble identifying high grade, large cell lymphomas by Flow. The Pathologists have no trouble diagnosing these by morphology and immunohistochemical stains performed in Histology, but the Flow results have been unable to pick up the aberrant cells and support their findings. We were blaming this on our method of processing which includes using a closed system tissue grinder and thought that these cells might have been too fragile to survive this step because we were not even seeing large cells present. Then last week we had an FNA (which does not get exposed to the tissue grinding process) which contained mostly very large cells that only stained with CD45 (weaker than the normal lymphocytes), CD19 (negative to weak on APC and totally negative on PerCP), and CD22 (negative to weak). Morphologically these cells looked like a high grade, large cell lymphoma and the CD20 was obviously positive by immunohistochemical stains. The differences that I have found between the antibodies used my both methods are the clone and isotype. The antibodies that we use for Flow are the clone L27 and the isotype IgG1. The antibodies used for the immunohistochemical stains are the clone L26 and isotype IgG2a. Both are monoclonal and mouse anti-human antibodies. Has anyone else found this same problem in their institutions or have any advice? Thanks in advance, Brenda Rabeno, MT (ASCP) Flow Cytometry/Tissue Procurement Laboratory brabeno@christianacare.orgReceived on Tue Aug 31 17:18:00 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 18 2004 - 03:12:06 EST