RE: Effective fixatives and validation (Was: Sorting live human lymphocytes) [HS-GWG6QA3]

From: David Coder (d_coder@MSN.com)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 12:29:49 EST


This brings up the issue of validating procedures--something that almost no
one does unless required to as fundamental part of running a  clinical or
manufacturing laboratory.

So, I'd agree: unless you have demonstrated (and do so on a periodic basis)
that your methods and materials consistently give the results that you
claim, you may just be whistling in the dark.

Dave
======================
David M. Coder, Ph.D.
Consultant in Cytometry
Seattle, Washington
tel./message: 206-499-3446
email: d_coder@msn.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Shapiro [mailto:hms@shapirolab.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:35 PM
To: cyto-inbox
Subject: RE: Sorting live human lymphocytes



A question that I will ask because it has not come up on this thread is:

What about "fixed" lymphocytes? My recollection is that

1) the papers about HIV inactivation by various fixatives are pretty old,
and

2) people who fix lymphocytes use fixatives that are reported to inactivate
HIV, but I wouldn't take bets on whether the fixative concentrations and
fixation times are greater than or equal to those reported to be necessary
to completely inactivate virus in an infected specimen (which would
presumably vary with viral load).

Just thought I'd ask.

-Howard


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:43:33 EST