RE: "Break in period" question

From: Fischer, Randy (NIH/NIAMS) (fischer1@mail.nih.gov)
Date: Thu Jan 23 2003 - 13:14:22 EST


Andy,

It would of course be absolutely wonderful if any piece of lab equipment
worked perfectly right "out of the box".  However, we all know that the more
complicated the equipment, the more of a break-in period necessary for
optimal function.  Therefore, the sorter (FACSDiVa) has so many "moving
parts", that there is an amount of tweaking to reach optimum performance.
The DiVa obviously has to be adjusted daily to some extent automatically
meaning it cannot be at peak until the user has become familiar with
adjusting the particular instrument.  Conversely, our FACSCalibur basically
was running to peak performance as soon as the engineer was done with the
install, but it has virtually no user affected critical parts (lasers,
stream adjustment etc).

Randy T. Fischer
NIH/NIAMS
Building 10, Room 6D50
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20892
(301) 594-3537
fischer1@mail.nih.gov

> ----------
> From:		Andrew Oberyszyn
> Sent:		Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:20 PM
> To:	Cytometry Mailing List
> Subject:	"Break in period" question
>
> Hi Flow-ers,
> We recently purchased a BD VantageSE and have had some "break in" period
> before we got it working optimally.
> I was wondering what kind of "break in periods" others have had on
> installations of new instruments?
> I would prefer to hear about sorter but times for analyzers would be
> interestingas well.
>
> Thanks in advance for any information!
> Andy
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   Andy Oberyszyn, M.S.
>   Core lab manager
>   The Ohio State University
>   University Cell Analysis & Sorting Core
>   424 Davis Heart & Lung Institute
>   473 West 12th Avenue
>   Columbus, Ohio 43210
>   Tel: 614/292-FLOW(3569)
>   Fax: 614/292-7335
>   E-Mail: cytometry@osu.edu
>    Website: http://heartlung.osu.edu/hlri/corelabs/flowcore.jsp
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "What if the Hokey Pokey is really what it's all about?!?"
>


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:43:28 EST