RE: 2002 was a good year in Cytometry- 2003 will be a great year!

From: Hamelik, Ronald (RHamelik@med.miami.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 23 2003 - 09:49:23 EST


Paul, I saw your comments about the lack of representation from India in
ISAC.  We just came back from the 2nd Indo-US workshop in Cytometry. Drs.
Cram, ormerod, Shankey and Hamelik were ISAC members on the faculty.  We had
four other flow cytometrists with us who deal with drug effects and HIV.  We
taught for 5 days lectures and wet labs.  All the major flow cytometer
manufacturers were represented. We have planned two more workshops for 09/03
and 01/04 to be held in Jammu and Bombay.  Last year we had 46 tuition
paying attendees and this year we had to limit it to 34 due to space
constraints.  There are more than 250 flow cytometers in the country and
from the workshop we saw a major interest in this field.  Isac tends to be
Euro-UScentric and India and far east is not represented.  We had taken 8
faculty members from USA and UK ( all isac members) to teach in this
workshop.  We asked ISAC for travel support ( $ 500 /per faculty for a total
of $1,000) as per their guide lines, but were turned down. Both Scot Cram
and I wrote to them, contacted Harry Crissman and  submitted applications
detailing the workshop and after a lot of run around were told there were no
funds available. I raised funds for the 8 attendee from other sources and
the local hosts provided rest of the funds.

I had expected ISAC to be more liberal and at least honour the guidelines
which are listed in their charter to support attendance of members at other
flow meetings.

With best wishes.Awtar Krishan from Miami.





-----Original Message-----
From: J.Paul Robinson [mailto:jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:06 PM
To: cyto-inbox
Subject: 2002 was a good year in Cytometry- 2003 will be a great year!



Colleagues

The Cytometry Discussion list has achieved its 11th full year with yet
another
increase in membership. There was a net gain of 143 new members this year
to bring the total to around 2300 - more than an inflationary increase. The
traffic on our server is higher than ever forcing us to replace all of our
web
servers in the next few weeks in a costly, but much needed improvement to
our aging and groaning network hardware.

Demographics
I reviewed the demographics of the discussion list and see some exciting and
some concerning issues which I will share with you. First, there are over 50
countries represented on the list and this does not count those who have
chosen to use a Yahoo or Hotmail account. As many of you know, I personally
review every request for membership to make sure we only enlist people with
genuine interests. We try hard to keep the spammers away and mostly
succeed. The list is also monitored by Steve Kelley, so occasionally Steve
removes personal messages accidentally sent, or blatant advertising that
sneaks through.

I am excited that we have 24 members from Brazil - a year or two ago there
were 2. Obviously, there is a lot of activity there. Mexico has also
increased to
13 members. Taking 7 of the previous Eastern Block countries there are a
total of 67 members - also showing a serious increase with 27 members from
Poland alone - I am certain a number of them are students who particiapted
in
the several outstanding courses run by Jurek Dobrucki in Krakow! South
Africa used to have 2 members.....now there are 21 - I think Mike Ormerod
has been repsonsible for stimulating many people to particiapte. Australia
as
usual breaks all the rules and for its miniscule population dominates the
member to population ratio by far. 96 members. Obviously, they spend too
much time in the sun down there.

Concerns
However, there are some concerns. Three of the worlds largest populations -
China (5 members) , India (2) and Indonesia (1) are totally
underrepresented.
For about 70% of the world's population to have only 0.3% of the
membership demonstrates to me that we, as a scientific interest group need
to pay more attention to these countries. Perhaps it is something that our
lords, masters and mistresses of ISAC and other cytometry organizations
need to pay some serious attention to.

Future meetings
The ISAC meeting this year was an outstanding success and the organizers
are to be congratulated indeed. Let me remind you all that the Cytomics
meeting will be taking place in Wales in May 2003. I was in Cardiff a few
weeks ago, just a few miles from where the meeting will be held and it is a
wonderful place to see. I encourage you to consider going to the Cytomics
Congress run by Professor Paul Smith. I will certainly be going. Talking of
Cytomics, we will most likely be doing another CD-ROM for this meeting. It
will be our second CD on Cytomics. I believe that the integration of
cytometry
within genomics and proteomics brings new opportunities for us all and we
need to be proactive in that area.

PUCL web site
We try to keep the PUCL web site up to date, but it is tough. We also try to
keep a balance between being informative and not going over the line on
commercials. One thing we added last year was sponsored pages. You will
note there are a number of banners that you can click on IF YOU WANT TO
ONLY!! These banners assist us to maintain the site. We are opening up
more pages and encourage you to visit the sponsors because it is the only
way we can maintain our site that has over 50,000 pages of information -
some hidden kaddidles of pages deep! This will allow more companies to
participate and help us maintain this service to you. We don't pay to have
our
site listed on any search engine, nor do we actively pursue keeping it
there,
but it remains the top site searched on about a dozen of the largest search
engines when searching for CYTOMETRY. I use the PUBMED,GOOGLE and
ANTIBODY serch engines on the top of our page almost daily. I hope they
are useful to you as well.

2003
I want to wish all of you a prosperous and intellectually stimulating (you
choose the order) 2003. Personally, this past year was a great year for
manuscripts for my lab, and my goal is even more this next year. The PUCL
laboratory at PURDUE is in for some dramatic and exciting changes in 2003.
We are reorganizing the entire laboratory!!! After 14 years here, it is time
to
change to meet the future.  I am very excited about the future of Cytometry
and Cytomics.....and how we as a field of interest impact the field of
science
generally. We for one, will be doing much more in imaging and cytometry-
imaging-cytomics type interactions. I think it's a strong area.

Thanks for your support and participation in the Cytometry Discussion Forum
in 2002. Steve Kelley and I look forward to bringing a record 12th year in
Internet-based cytometry. If I could remember who those 10 members were
who were the first 10 (invited) participants, I bet none of them would have
believed how this list has grown. It was a task to convince ISAC to add
EMAIL
addresses. In fact, in cleaning up my office this week, I found a letter I
sent to
Jean Parker in 1990 pleading with her to add a box for EMAIL addresses in
the membership list. They did! Keep up the quality discussion. Your public
discussions are a valuable contribution to the field of Cytometry. Buy
Howard
Shapiro's 4th edition if it ever gets published...(I note it's now slated
for March
2003.....come on Howard, get to work!) Cytometry is by no means dead. Long
live cytometry.

J. Paul Robinson
Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories, December 31, 2002

J.Paul Robinson, PhD             PH:(765)4940757
Professor of Immunopharmacology
Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Purdue University          FAX:(765)4940517
EMAIL:jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
WEB: http://www.cyto.purdue.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:43:28 EST