From: Katedra Genetyki i Hodowli Roslin (elwira@tower.atr.bydgoszcz.pl)
Date: Tue Nov 17 1998 - 04:30:51 EST
Dear Mika,
I am using Partec devices for years and I am quite happy with them.
At present I have Partec CCA which is much simpler than PAS, but I have seen
demonstration of new PAS III and I found it very good (beside being
relatively cheap, as you noticed). Of course it depends what you want to use
it for. I think the best you can do is to contact Prof. Gohde or Dr. Ost
(phone +49 2534 8008 0, fax +49 2534 8008 90) and they will answer all your
questions. The company is always open and helpful in resolving their
clients' problems.
Greetings, Elwira Sliwinska
At 13:20 98-11-16 +0200, you wrote:
>
>
>Hello all flow cytometrists,
>
>I do not have a long history behind me in the field of flow cytometry and
>I have only been working with Becton Dickinson instruments (FACScan,
>FACStarPLUS), so I hope that someone of you specialists could help me
>with my question.
>
>We have plans of buying a new flow cytometer (FACSCalibur) to our
>facility, but one of my friends called me today and told me about an
>interesting cytometer. He said that he has been invited to visit a
>company (Partec GmbH, Germany) and they want to present their PAS flow
>cytometer to him.
>
>The flow cytometer my friend told me about can be found in Internet on page
>
>http://www.partec.de/products/pas.html
>
>I am now asking about your experience and/or opinion of that kind of
>particle analyzing system. What about its advantages and disadvantages
>compared to Calibur, of course it is lacking the sort option but it is
>also much cheaper than Calibur, I could buy two of those PAS machines
>with a price of one Calibur.
>
>
>Lots of thanks in advance,
>
>
>Mika Korkeamki
>FCM operator
>University of Turku
>FINLAND
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:35:26 EST
