FW: HeLa, K562 & cell cycle...

From: Reece, Lisa (lreece@utmb.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 11 1998 - 18:06:23 EST


-----Original Message-----
From: Reece, Lisa 
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 5:03 PM
To: cyto-inbox
Subject: RE: HeLa, K562 & cell cycle...


Mark,

As an aside to Derek's message, you must also be sure that the PI solution
you use includes RNase.  Remember that PI is a nucleic acid stain and will
bind to RNA as well as DNA and this could result in broaden peaks as well.

Good luck,
Lisa Reece
Molecular Cytometry Unit
Univ. of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, TX  USA
Office: (409)747-1932
FAX: (409)772-6527
E-mail: lreece@utmb.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Davies [mailto:daviesd2@icrf.icnet.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 5:00 AM
To: cyto-inbox
Cc: Cytometry Mailing List
Subject: Re: HeLa, K562 & cell cycle...




Mark,

The standard 70% ethanol fixation procedure followed by PI should give
reasonable DNA histograms certainly for K562s. Depending on the HeLa
strain that you are using, you may see a broadened G1 peak but it should
still be good enough for sorting G1, S, G2. If you dont require live
cells afterwards and the fixation doesnt interfere with whatever you have
planned subsequently, then this is probably the best place to start.

Hoechst is the way to go if you want the cells to be live, but the
staining is very much dependent on cell type, you will have to play with
the concentrations of H33342 and the time of staining. Usually if there is
a broad peak, I would up the concentration - Hoechst can be cytotoxic at
high concentrations so be careful not to go too high - I find that 10ug/ml
is a good starting point; and if the cells have the MDR phenotype they
will be pumping the dye out and the addition of something like verapamil
or DiOC5 can help in these situations. You dont say what your Hoechst
staining conditions are but I would suggest either leaving the dye on
longer or increasing the concentration. Using Hoechst of course has the
added advantage that you can exclude dead cells by PI gating so you should
be able to see how cytotoxic your staining conditions are.

Hope this helps etc,

Derek



On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, markster wrote:
> Do anyone have any experience/comments/references
> with regard to staining live, fixed or permeablised
> HeLa or K562 cells for sorting G0G1/S/G2M by DNA content
> using Hoechst 33342 or PI
> I have tried HO342 in 'live' K562 and was not able to sort or
> distinguish cell cycle phases. One peak very very broad!
> Mark

****************************************************************************
*  Derek Davies                       Voice: (44) 0171 269 3394            *
*  FACS Laboratory,                   FAX: (44) 0171 269 3100              *
*  Imperial Cancer Research Fund,     e_mail: derek.davies@icrf.icnet.uk   *
*  London, UK                                                              *
*                                                                          *
*  Web Page: http://www.icnet.uk/axp/facs/davies/index.html                *
****************************************************************************


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:35:26 EST