RE: FACS

From: Houston, Jim (Jim.Houston@stjude.org)
Date: Mon Aug 10 1998 - 08:16:19 EST

Next message: TRAGANOS FRANK: "RE: "FACS""
Previous message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: data representation"
Maybe in reply to: Alice L. Givan: "FACS"
Next in thread: Mark A. KuKuruga: "Re: FACS"
Reply: Mark A. KuKuruga: "Re: FACS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

FACS was before MoFlo was concieved.

We will all have to see if MoFlo can stand the challenge of time.  Can
Cytomation redesign the electronics of the MoFLo to keep up with future
needs?  Is this another Cytoflurograph?

Long live the FACS.

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	smonard@adarc.org [SMTP:smonard@adarc.org]
> Sent:	Friday, August 07, 1998 1:37 PM
> To:	Cytometry Mailing List
> Subject:	FACS
> 
> 
> 
> The term FACS is a Becton Dickinson trademark and an acronym for
> Fluorescence activated cell sorter. It is rather outdated and will
> surely
> be replaced by the word MoFlo soon!
> 
> Simon Monard
> 

-- End --

Next message: TRAGANOS FRANK: "RE: "FACS""
Previous message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: data representation"
Maybe in reply to: Alice L. Givan: "FACS"
Next in thread: Mark A. KuKuruga: "Re: FACS"
Reply: Mark A. KuKuruga: "Re: FACS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:35:22 EST