RE: List reply-to setting.

From: Echeagaray, Patricia L. (echeagaray@sri.org)
Date: Wed Feb 11 1998 - 08:27:17 EST


Hi Mark,

Actually, on my Netscape 3.01, I have a choice of sending to the auther
(as in you in reference to the note below) or to the entire list (such
as the NG and to you) perhaps you are using a version that doesn't give
you those choices, or you are "clicking" on the less correct one?


<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>

Patricia L. Echeagaray;  echeagaray@sri.org
Flow Cytometry Services
Southern Research - Frederick
431 Aviation Way     Frederick, Maryland 21701
USA
Voice: (301) 228-2170 
   FAX: (301) 694-7223
echeagaray@sri.org
<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>


>----------
>From: 	Mark A. Corio[SMTP:rmi@frontiernet.net]
>Sent: 	Monday, February 09, 1998 5:18 PM
>To: 	Cytometry Mailing List
>Subject: 	List reply-to setting.
>
>
>Steve,
>Belonging to several lists, I found something unusual when I joined this
>list....the reply-to setting is to the original author instead of the list.
> Several others mentioned it recently and I wonder if the list would like
>to have the reply-to set to the list so that more responses appear on-line
>instead of personal conversations. The list traffic goes up a little, but
>the responses are often more valuable with information than the original
>posts. Anyone else feel this would be a good idea? Is there a reason it is
>the way it is, Steve, that we shouldn't change it?
>
>Mark A. Corio
>Rochester MicroSystems, Inc.
>200 Buell Road, Suite 9
>Rochester, NY  14624
>Tel: (716) 328-5850
>Fax: (716) 328-1144
>e-mail: rmi@frontiernet.net
>http://www.frontiernet.net/~rmi/
>****** Designing Electronics for Research and Industry ******
>


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:35:13 EST