Re: cell cycle problems

From: Howard Shapiro (hms@shapirolab.com)
Date: Mon Feb 09 1998 - 18:59:58 EST


Alice Givan asks:

>Can someone point me to the state-of-the-art  for cell cycle analysis with:
>1) cells fixed in formaldehyde 
>2) live cells
>
>We have GFP-fusion-protein-transfected cells and,  in the first instance, need
>to fix in formaldehyde (not ethanol) to retain the GFP but want to get good DNA
>profiles.  Is there a stain that works better than PI with formaldehyde-fixed
>cells or is there a method for opening up the fixed histones/DNA so as to
>improve the PI profile without losing the GFP?
>
>In the second instance,  we would like to keep the cells alive during this
>procedure.  Is there a staining method with one of the Hoechst dyes that will 
>give us histograms sharp enough to allow cell cycle analysis or is there any
>better vital alternative?
>

Hoechst 33342 (HO342) can work well with both formalin-fixed and unfixed cells.

We find that addition of 0.1% Triton X-100 improves resolution of DNA histograms
on formaldehyde-fixed cells stained with 1 ug/ml HO342. Gentler permeabilization
with saponin or Tween can also be used if Triton is a problem with GFP.  We have
also recently noted that leaving cells in formaldehyde for long periods of time
(days) greatly increases background fluorescence in the FITC channel; this seems
to be due to a chemical reaction between HO342 and reaction products of formal-
dehyde.  We have had some success in decreasing background by adding glycine,
a procedure suggested by Richard Riese.

Good vital staining with Hoechst depends, first, on using a relatively high
concentration of the dye, and, second, on neutralizing efflux pumps if the cells
have them.  Awtar Krishan described the use of trifluoperazine and verapamil for
blocking the pump; cyanine dyes appear to do the same, as noted by Crissman
et al
at Los Alamos.  We can generally get CV's below 5% on live lymphoblastoid cells
with HO342, and have gotten as low as 2-2.5% in cells simultaneously stained
with HO342 and DiIC1(5) (this was demonstrated at the Portsmouth, NH SAC meeting
in 1981, when we brought a dual-beam Cytomutt up from Boston).

-Howard


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:35:12 EST