IX. Final Open-Ended Responses

Q 63. What would you most like to change about Purdue?
Click to view snapshot results of (Q 63)

Approximately the same number of respondents answered this question as answered Question 62, but these responses were typically 2-3 times longer. The 16 most frequently mentioned issues are included below, in order from the most to least commonly cited.

  • Administrative performance
    “If I could, I would make the administrators realize that their role is to serve as facilitators instead of as dictators.”

    “Administrators that don't have the guts to treat all academic units and faculty fairly and put resources including pay increases where they should be going. Administrators should quit sitting around creating red tape that the faculty has to deal with when they want and should be teaching. This list could go on and on.”

    “The top-down type of administration.  People are generally happier if they feel that they have some control over their lives, including many of the aspects of their jobs.  Administrators who truly listen to faculty input and not just say they do are sorely needed.”

    I would like Purdue to aggressively consider what administrative functions could be moved out of faculty hands and be accomplished more efficiently in a centralized fashion.

  • Salaries
    “Competitive salaries. We don't do too badly on averages, but on the high-end salaries, or salaries in key disciplines, we do very poorly. Our best faculty members are often lured away by significant salary increases.”

    “We have been receiving basically cost-of-living increases now for as long as I have been here. Faculty salaries should be increased.”

    “Provide 12 month salary for faculty who are trying to build a world-class research area, but are on academic year support.  Hard to do on an academic year salary.”

    “Faculty salaries have fallen way behind those at peer institution. Tap into the endowment if necessary to remedy this now.”

  • The location
    “Move it to the west coast.”

    “Move it to a suburb of Chicago!  I'm partly serious.  Geographical location is not the best.  Climate is not terrific either.  It's the land of married people, and it's quite horrible for single faculty in terms of meeting people.”

    “Move it to tropics.”

    “Move it up by Lake Michigan.... seriously, have bike/walking/running paths...have ice rinks...outdoor recreation!! Real stuff...not some little 0.5 mile trail.”

  • Conservatism
    “Become less conservative!”

    “The incredibly conservative nature of the University and community.”

    “I would like to see more open-mindedness, more awareness of the world beyond Indiana, more bold initiatives, and more creativity.”

    “We must move on to the next level.  Purdue is a great institution -except for a few individuals- but it is also extremely conservative. Conservatism in this rapidly evolving era will put us behind sooner than we think.  Our faculty, staff and students should be trained to accept and adapt to the changing science and society.”

  • The bureaucracy
    “Its over bureaucratization.  The micromanagement from the vice president through the deans to the department heads.  The feudalism of its schools and departments.”

    “The strong hierarchical structure of the university. I'd like to make it more participative where things don't come down to you, but you actually have a say in decisions –like electing a dept head, or establishing the policies in the dept. I'd like the institution to actually connect its discourse with its actions...it's very frustrating to hear constantly that we are a research institution and then find all your attempts at conducting research hindered by bureaucracy from lack of space to 'we've never done it this way before.' "

    “Red tape, and it seems to increase almost every day. Top down philosophy is becoming overbearing.”

    “Reduce the bureaucracy/red tape and the slowness with which change can occur. Increase flexibility and be more open-minded to new ways of tackling our responsibilities.”

  • The infrastructure
    Better research infrastructure, better labs and offices.”

    “Quality of building, both labs, office, and seminar and teaching rooms.”

    “Infrastructure is terrible, especially with respect to air-handling systems which are very noisy and ineffective for modern research labs.  Plumbing, gas lines, and electrical are also inadequate.”

  • Level of support for Schools of Liberal Arts and Education
    “That the central administration allots more resources to the humanities units in the university. I once heard a vice president of the University refer to such units as "non-productive" because they did not bring in research monies and because their research had no commercial viability. And it is these units in particular that are suffering from problems in faculty recruitment and retention.”

    “I'm tired of being poor.  The School of Education is drastically under funded by central administration… This leads to many problems with equipment and S&E.  Our salaries are low compared to other institutions, which makes faculty recruitment difficult.”

    “Make it more of a real university rather than the engineering dominated school it is. i.e. it would be great if liberal arts programs on campus were in the top ten in the country. This would automatically change the environment of campus and local community.”

    “The lack of institutional support for the School of Liberal Arts is demoralizing.  We are treated as second-class citizens by administrators, faculty in other schools, and our own students sometimes.  Morale is at one of its all-time lows in my department because of this.  Our salaries are not anywhere near to being competitive with peer institutions, and even when they are, faculty leave because they tire of being unappreciated.  These issues need to be addressed urgently and substantively if there is any hope of taking Purdue "to the next level," as we've heard from President Jischke in recent months.  What good will it do us if we turn out technically trained undergrads who don't know how to read, write, and think critically?  The School of Liberal Arts is not a useless appendage. It ought to be the cornerstone of an excellent university education.”

  • The lack of diversity
    “I would like to increase the racial diversity.”

    “Cultural diversity.”

    “Need more racial and ethnic diversity.”

  • Funding levels
    “Lack of funding, in general, in the School of Education--we have no flexibility to do anything. Every little penny is counted.”

    “I would like more funding for my research and scholarship.”

    “Probably funding.... I think our faculty and administration know how to succeed, but the funds to do it are just not forthcoming.”

  • Dental plan
    “Lack of dental plan is hurting us when we interview.”

    “Dental Coverage!  I have never been on a faculty that does not have dental coverage as a family benefit. We need to add dental coverage to the health plans of the university.  The escrow approach to predicting costs of annual major dental/medical procedures and setting this aside in a pretax "savings" account which cannot be accessed for other purposes if not used, and does not carry over from one year to the next, is a terrible alternative!”

    “We need dental coverage.”

  • Library resources
    Double the number of books and periodicals in the HSSE Library.”

    “Better library.”

    “We desperately need not only a new central library, but also far more funding for books and academic journals in the humanities.”

  • The quality of undergraduate students
    Better undergraduate students.

    The overall low quality of the undergraduate students at Purdue.

    “Requirements for undergraduate admission seem rather low. We have lots of great students, but too many students are marginal. The need to keep enrollment high is a negative.”

  • Support for spouses
    “Approach to spousal hiring. We need a coherent policy to address the fact that a high percentage of candidates for positions are partnered with other academics.  As it is now, we have a hit-and-miss policy of cooperation among departments.  I've now seen five or six junior faculty members leave the school due to spousal job concerns.”

    “Lack of support for dual-career couples.  Unless something changes in this area, we will likely leave Purdue within the next couple years.  Living apart is an unacceptable arrangement for us.  Purdue tries to act as if they want to help dual-career couples, but there is no real follow-through as far as commitment to hire spouses of Purdue faculty first over other candidates.  Cross-department collaboration on this issue needs to be fostered through powerful incentive programs for hiring qualified faculty spouses.”

    “My wife’s experience with the Spousal Relocation Office was not only frustrating, it was humiliating to her (she has a Ph.D. as well). She went on to find a position here on her own, but I doubt she will ever feel an attachment to Purdue based on her early, very negative experiences. We will likely leave as soon as we can find other positions. To provide start up packages worth tens of thousands of dollars and then not pay any attention to this other important detail is very short-sighted.”

  • The emphasis on teaching
    The reward in the faculty and recommendation process to those who engage in the scholarship of teaching, integration and application. Too much is focused solely on discovery.

    “The only thing valued in our department is getting external grant money and publishing.  Good teaching and collegiality are not valued at all.”

    “The de-emphasis on quality teaching.”

    “Absolutely no rewards monetary or otherwise for undergraduate teaching.  In fact, we're criticized if we spend too much time on it.”

  • Class size
    Have smaller class size.”

    “Class size is way too large and getting larger.” 

    “I would put caps on class size, at least in Liberal Arts.”

  • Parking
    “Parking! The parking here is amazingly bad, compared to other universities I have been to. I would be willing to pay MUCH, MUCH more in order to have a spot close to my building. When I had small infants who were nursing, I once calculated that I spent 10 hours per week looking for parking spots and walking to/from them and my office. This is not including driving time to/from my house. That is an enormous waste of productive time.”

    “Parking, parking, parking - a daily frustration which truly impedes my research and wastes a tremendous amount of my time! The hours spent looking for parking and walking back and forth multiple times daily to the parking lot because of a lack of research facilities on campus would be better spent on teaching and research! I am really tired of getting parking tickets while loading and unloading materials and equipment - campus police are occasionally but not consistently understanding about this.”

Differences by School

Faculty in Education, Liberal Arts, Technology, and Veterinary Medicine were the most likely to say that they would like to see an increase in their salary.