Re: use of multiple fluorescent cell tracking dyes

From: Jonni S. Moore (moorej@mail.MED.UPENN.EDU)
Date: Wed Nov 13 2002 - 17:07:07 EST


Dear Andy,

You are correct..CFSE is difficult to deal with in a multicolor
strategy until about 24 hrs post labeling. This is partially  because
it takes some time for the staining of the cytosolic proteins to
become labeled in a stable manner.  A better choice would be to use
PKH26 as a red tracker and PKH67 as a green tracker.  Since the PKH
dyes bind to lipid moieties, the staining is instantaneous  and
stable.  You can control the intensity by concentration of dye.  We
have used these (and CFSE) in a variety of multicolor protocols with
success and feel that for shorter time periods the PKH family is
better...for longer time periods where you need to assess cell
division, then more caveats enter into the equation.

good luck
Jonni






>Dear Flow-ers,
>I have a friend who wishes to identify adoptively transferred
>murine cells approx. 12 hours after injection. He would like to track 2
>separately labelled, or "tagged" cell populations, staining with
>multiple cell surface markers after isolating the cells from the
>recipient, but isn't interested in cell division. Because of the
>experimental setup congenic markers wouldn't be suitable. Am I right in
>thinking that CFSE would be too bright at this timepoint?
>Any info would be greatly appreciated.
>Thanks,
>Andy
>
>----------------------
>Andrew Herman
>Department of Pathology & Microbiology
>University of Bristol
>University Walk
>Bristol  BS8 1TD
>Tel. +44 117 928 7511
>Fax. +44 117 928 7896
>A.Herman@bristol.ac.uk

--
Jonni S. Moore, Ph.D.
Associate Prof. of Path. and Lab. Med.
Director of Clinical and Research Flow Cytometry
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
203 John Morgan Bldg.
Philadelphia, PA  19104-6082
Phone:  215-898-6853
FAX:    215-898-4227



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:29 EST