FW: FACS question

From: Rosson, Dan (RossonD@MLHS.ORG)
Date: Fri Dec 14 2001 - 07:53:11 EST


I don't think anyone was being harsh. I'm a flow novice and one thing I
learned first about flow people is that they are the most helpful people in
the business and they have a sense of humor. Anyone who's read Howard's book
should know that. Remember the "no Falcon around" line? If we were
thin-skinned and arrogant, we wouldn't be Flow People. We might be Study
Section members though,... but I'm digressing. I say keep up the banter and
don't look for excuses to be offended.





Dan Rosson Ph.D.

Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
100 Lancaster Ave.
Wynnewood PA 19096





-----Original Message-----
From: Gerstein, Rachel [mailto:Rachel.Gerstein@umassmed.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:21 AM
To: cyto-inbox
Subject: RE: FACS question



Aren't you being a bit harsh?

I want to suggest that we all try to phrase our responses in a manner that
educates, but does not flog the person asking the question.  Yes, its really
important to ask the right question, with a request for specific
information.  Yes, we all grind our teeth in response to some questions.
Really poorly phrased questions tend not to get answered.  However, there
have been some very harsh responses in the last few weeks.  We all were new
and/or ignorant at some point.  Lets not scare away people who might really
benefit from the list !

just mho...

Rachel

=======================================================
Rachel M. Gerstein, Ph.D.
Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology
Graduate Program in Immunology/Virology
University of Massachusetts Medical School
55 Lake Avenue North
Worcester, MA 01655-0002
(508) 856-1044
(508) 856-5920 (FAX)


> ----------
> From:		J.Paul Robinson
> Reply To:	jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
> Sent:		Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:20 PM
> To:	Cytometry Mailing List
> Subject:	Re: FACS question
>
>
> Colleagues: I am going to answer this question in a manner that I hope you
> all
> understand (or not)......(think of the bad data issue)
>
> You can solve the problem by adding reagent A to reagent B, plotting FL3
> Vs FL2.
> If you add reagent C, then a single histogram of FL5 should do the trick.
> I think you
> could also try probe A and probe B, both of which should have the right
> spectra...Oh,
> turn the power of laser 1 up a bit, and you should get some valuable
> data.....
>
> sorry, I couldn't resist it...
> please stop using terms which are totally undefined....
>
> Paul Robinson
>
>
> On 10 Dec 2001, at 11:58, Laura H
> odges wrote:
>
>
> I'd like to post a question on your website:
>
>
> Can anyone suggest another P-gp accumulation probe
> other than rhodamine 123 which has too broad of an
> emission spectrum for my use.  I am trying to find a
> P-gp probe that can be used with other fluorescent
> markers in channels FL2, FL3, and FL4 in a multicolor
> assay.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
> J.Paul Robinson, PhD		   PH:(765)4940757
> Professor of Immunopharmacology
> Professor of Biomedical Engineering
> Purdue University	     FAX:(765)4940517
> EMAIL:jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
> WEB: http://www.cyto.purdue.edu
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:43 EST