Re: 3rd party onsite training

From: Jonni S. Moore (moorej@mail.MED.UPENN.EDU)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2001 - 09:14:43 EST


We are not a company, but rather a very large academic facility (we
have a FACSTar Plus, FACSVantage Turbosort, and will have a
FACSVantage Diva + another sorter in a BL3 sorting facility by
spring, and we have 10 tabletops) and do both clinical and research
applications.  Several years ago we started a formal training program
that can be customized to the users..and have provided this training
to our own institution (over 200 people this year) as well as to both
industry and academia (Yale, Merck, Centocor, SmithKline to name a
few).  We feel strongly that education is imperative to quality flow
cytometry thus we focus not only on instrument operation and software
use, but also on applications and practical issues of experimental
design ...at the France ISAC, this was discussed and the vendors
supported the idea of experts in labs providing training in addition
to that offered directly by the companies with a subsidy from the
vendors.  All three vendors present (Coulter, BD and Cytomation
agreed in principle, but nothing has been done yet..in summary, I
think training can often best be provided by third parties and very
often these are core facilities where education is a focus.  The
problem is compensation..what was suggested was that the vendors
provide "scholarships" to labs (or for the trainers to come to the
sites) for more detailed and customized training  allowing the cores
to be reimbursed for their time and effort...while we have
implemented a training program available to outside users, it is
limited due to the cost for many smaller labs..what about it vendors?
Can we get something like this going finally???  Clearly there is a
need and there should be ways to do this to benefit all
involved..This certainly ties in to the thread addressing bad flow
data..education is the best QC!  We will have a poster at ISAC
detailing our process and results...an interesting fallout of this is
that for the past 10 years, our usage has consistently and steadily
increased, always operating in a revenue neutral mode (even with
adding staff and instruments)...education is also the best "sales
tool" for the core lab (and the vendors as well!).....So how about it
BD, Cytomation,Coulter...can we get something at least proposed by
San Diego???

Jonni
--
Jonni S. Moore, Ph.D.
Associate Prof. of Path. and Lab. Med.
Director of Clinical and Research Flow Cytometry
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
203 John Morgan Bldg.
Philadelphia, PA  19104-6082
Phone:  215-898-6853
FAX:    215-898-4227



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:41 EST