LSR

From: David Dombkowski (dombkows@helix.mgh.harvard.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 12 2001 - 08:17:29 EST


Bunny, you have just realized the difference between the configuration of
the LSR vs the Facscan but all is not lost. You are right in that the
3-part dif of SSC vs FSC is not as elegant as the Facscan but I have been
able to get very high quality diff's by playing with the adjustment of both
FALS and SSC gains. It may require a little adjustment of the SSC dichroic
to maximize the separation in SSC. Beware when adjusting this dichroic that
you may notice a change in FITC vs PE or in the UV signal. There is a
"synergy" between the dichroic angles and maximum signal to PMT that is
essential to acheive. You may also want to play with the angle of PMT to
acheive maximum signal.
 The compensation between the FL3 and APC is not able to be done.The B.D.
software will not cross beam compensate so that you will have to consider
software compensation using WinList or FlowJo which is really quite easy to
do. Try WinList using the compensation toolbox and saving file with newly
compensated parameters. My observation is that you can have some effect on
this compensation problem when adjusting say FL3-FL1 or by adjusting the
gain of PMT. You need to spend some time playing with the optimization of
this instrument in order to acheive an understanding of how everything
works.

David

David M. Dombkowski
dombkowski@helix.mgh.harvard.edu
Flow Cytometry-Pathology-CNY rm7017
149 13th Street
Massachusetts General Hospital-East
Boston, MA 02129
Tel. (617)726-1683
Fax.(617)724-3164



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:38 EST