Re: thanks! HLA vs. MHC but there is more...

From: Larry Arnold (lwarma@med.unc.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2001 - 14:48:36 EST





Maciej

I haven't followed this whole thread so maybe I missed something but I don't get the confusion that you derive from this paragraph.  Everything is accurate.  As far as I see it there is no argument to start.

Humans do have MHC Class I and II.  MHC stands for major histocompatibility complex - i.e. all the genes and their products that define the major histocompatibility system (i.e. those gene products that lead to tissue rejection in the classical rapid way).  All mammals (as well as other animals) have an MHC.  MHC is thus the generic collective term for these genes/proteins and HLA is the term used for the MHC system in humans.  HLA stands for human lymphocyte antigen.  In the old days this definition/term derived from the fact that the different gene products that led to the rejection were defined on lymphocytes and detected using the mixed lymphocyte reaction.  Even though the antigens were defined on lymphocytes we now know that class I is expressed on nearly all nucleated cells (and some others as was mentioned) while class II has a much more limited distribution primarily on antigen presenting cells including monocyte/macrophage, dendritic and B cells.  The reason for the evolution of the 2 types derives from the need for afferent antigen recognition and cell activation (known as antigen processing and presentation) and efferent cell killing by cytotoxic T cells.  The same system could not be used for both functions or it would have led to the killing of any cell that had viral antigens (or other pathogen) - whether the cell was actually infected or had simply taken up viral proteins.  This would have lead to massive tissue destruction by the CTLs.  The MHC contains quite a few genes.  In humans the major groups are HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C - the Class I MHC genes/proteins and HLA-D the Class II MHC genes/products.  Also within the human population each major group has many "polymorphisms" - i.e. distinct types but still members of the group.  This polymorphism is what leads to tissue rejection since we are outbred any given individual is most likely to have different genes/proteins that will be recognized as "foreign" by another individual.  Each human has the potential for 2 different HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C genes - one set from each of your parents.  Each class I gene product is a single glycoprotein non-covalently associated with beta2-microglobulin (and a peptide of course but we'll leave that aside for now).  HLA-D (human MHC class II) is more complicated because there are more genes (DR, DP, DQ etc) and because class II proteins are composed of 2 different proteins - alpha and beta to form a heterodimer (there is also the bound peptide of course). Some loci have multiple alpha and/or beta genes which may combine in different combinations leading to different heterodimer molecules.  All of the MHC molecules are codominant - i.e all the genes are expressed- so each cell will express 6 MHC class I ( 2 each of HLA-A,B,C) molecules and, on the appropriate cell types many class II (HLA-D) molecules.

I hope this helps with your confusion and doesn't start any arguments.  Any basic immunology text will tell all of the above.

Larry


At 06:56 PM 9/5/2001, you wrote:
I asked a few friends of mine who are in various (reputable) medical
schools about MHC vs. HLA.  When they took the 6 week course in
immunology as 2nd year students, they were told humans have MHC class
I and II. An immuno/microbio board review book I picked up at a
library also discusses MHC class I and II, in humans. So the
confusion is wide spread

I don't want to start an argument, but I just thought I'd mention it.


Larry W. Arnold, Ph.D.
Res. Assoc. Prof.
Director, Flow Cytometry Facility
Department of Microbiology and Immunology
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
CB# 7290
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Phone: 919-966-1530
FAX: 919-962-8103



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:30 EST