RE: Mouse NK1.1 cells in peripheral blood

From: Moss, Delynn M. (dmm3@CDC.GOV)
Date: Thu Apr 19 2001 - 06:32:57 EST


For NK cells in BALB/c mice, you might want to try Pharmingen's DX5 clone.

Delynn Moss

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Rick A. Bright [mailto:rbright@emory.edu]
		Sent:	Wednesday, April 18, 2001 12:08 AM
		To:	Cytometry Mailing List
		Subject:	Mouse NK1.1 cells in peripheral blood


		First, I want to thank the many of you who wrote to help me
figure out my
		first FACS protocol.  It is working very nicely and only
took me one failed
		attempts (which wasn't a failure at all because I learned
from the several
		mistakes), and has worked ever since.  I am having a couple
of problems
		overall that I hope someone can help me resolve.

		To remind everyone:  I am collecting whole blood from female
BALB/c mice
		(7-8 w.o.) and using 50ul to determine the blood cell count
and look for an
		upregulation of an apoptotic marker, CD95 (Fas).  My tubes
contain (all
		PharMingen):
		1) CD3-PerCP, CD4-PE, CD8-APC, CD95-FITC; 2)CD3-PerCP,
CD19-PE,
		Ly-6G(Neuts)-APC, NK1.1-FITC; and 3) CD3-PerCp, CD19-PE,
CD11b(Mac1)-APC,
		CD95-FITC  I also use 5ul of Fc Block in each tube for 5
minutes prior to
		adding the antibodies and I use the BD FACSlyse buffer (2mL
for 7-10min at
		rt).  I keep everything in the dark at all times and besides
the lyse step,
		all is done on ice.  I have PBS, FBS and Azide in my FACS
buffer and I fix
		the cells in a 500ul vol of 1% paraformaldehyde solution
after 2 washes with
		FACS buffer (I do not wait o/n to read the cells, however, I
read right
		away).

		First issue:  I tend to lose the CD3-PerCp color rather
quickly, especially
		on the double-positive with CD4-PE.  Sometimes all of the
CD4 are also CD3+
		and sometimes they sit down on the PE axis.  However, the
CD3-PerCp/CD8-APC
		seem to be more stable as double-positives.  Once, I read
the cells
		immediately and all of the CD4+ were also CD3+, the next
day, I checked
		again and the same #/% of CD4+ cells were collected, but
they were not
		double pos for CD3 and were back down to the CD4 axis.


		Second issue:  I cannot find any NK cells.  I know that they
should fall
		into the area that is slightly larger and slightly more
granular than
		lymphocytes and I have read that the population can be as
high as 5-10% of
		peripheral blood cells.  Does this sound right?  Is anyone
currently looking
		at NK cells in mice?  I am using the NK1.1 antibody from
PharMingen at a
		1:10 dilution, using 25 ul of the diluted antibodies in each
tube with 50ul
		of whole blood and staining for 30min on ice.  I check
everywhere, even
		without any gates and see nothing pop up in the LR quad of
my FL1 channel.


		Third issue (never say final, right?):	When collecting
events, I have taken
		off all thresholds to collect in the full window.  However,
as you know, I
		get many junk events that tends to quickly reduce the number
of "good"
		events that I want.  So, instead of setting thresholds (in
case my cells
		change during apoptosis or other forms of death and are not
rejects behind
		the threshold), I gated a region that goes all the way
around the perimeter
		of the window and makes an inward loop over the xy point of
axis.  I still
		acquire and save all events, but have the count go up to
10000 events within
		the gated region (which omits that massive clump of debris
at the axes.  So,
		in a way, I am trying to collect 10K events, excluding the
debris, but still
		collecting data on the debris.	This brought my valid
lymphocytes from a
		count of 800 to a count of thousands.


		Any thoughts on each or any of these questions would be most
helpful and
		appreciated.  I am very grateful for the expertise among
this membership and
		will soon be in a better position to cross to the other side
and give as
		much advise as I now borrow.  Thank you.

		Rick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:15 EST