BD was marketing the Cytek 96-well lloader while I was there last month. They even gave me the Cytek brochure. rick On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, James Simone wrote: > > To clarify, Cytek and BD Biosciences are marketing different loaders of their own > design. That's why you have the price discrepancy. From what I've heard, Cytek > will be releasing theirs sooner (if not already) whereas BD's might take longer. > > Jim > PPD Discovery, Inc. > Menlo Park, CA > > Rick Arthur Bright wrote: > > > Yes, I was at training at BD last month and they were discussing this new > > option. I doubt that you will find many who have used it yet, as it is > > only being released this month, other than demos or beta prototypes. I am > > surprised you got a $15,000 quote, as we were told govt pricing would be > > around $34K. It sounds great in theory since we do all of our staining in > > 96 well plates then transfer to cluster tubes before analysis. Let us > > know how it works for you, please. > > > > Rick > > > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Laird Bloom wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > Does anyone have experience using a device that automatically loads > > > samples from each well of a 96-well plate for running on a FACSCalibur? I > > > will soon be trying out a unit from Cytek (about $15,000), and would like to > > > know if anyone can comment on its reliability and performance. Has anyone > > > seen the BD 96-well loader? > > > Thanks, > > > Laird Bloom > > > Phylos, Inc. > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email > messages attached to it may contain information that is confidential or > legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient or a person > responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, > you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and > that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of this > transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone > or return email and delete the original transmission and its attachments > without reading or saving in any manner. > ______________________________________________________________________ >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:09 EST