Re: CFP

From: Glenn Paradis (gap@MIT.EDU)
Date: Thu Dec 14 2000 - 16:08:11 EST


Claude,

To excite CFP I use the 457 line from an I-70 on our TSO Vantage.  The 453
line actually does a better job to excite CFP but the power is lower.  The
signal to noise ratio was exactly the same reguardless of which excitation
line I used.

We use YFP with CFP for dual fluorescent protein experiments.  To excite
the YFP I have been using the 514 line or our argon ion laser.  In my hands
the YFP excites very well and there is just a slight amount of cross over
of CFP bleeding into my YFP channel but only for CFP signals above 10E3.  I
have never seen YFP bleed into my GFP detector.   I can avoid cross beam
compensation problems with my above setup.

My emmission filter for CFP is a 482/22.
My emmission filter for YFP is a 575/26 (not ideal but it works well enough)

Glenn
MIT



>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854";
>x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>As a newbie to CFP, I would like to ask those who have had the
>experience whether I should(not) expect to detect CFP using the UV line
>of an Enterprise II laser.  I realize it is not ideal... perhaps far
>from ideal, but I was wondering if I could get enough excitation.  While
>I'm at it, is there other experience out there for GHF / CFP together?
>I've read Beavis and Kalejta in Cytometry 37, 68-73, so mefears I'm out
>of luck with an Enterprise II and Melles Griot HeNe (on a MoFlo).
>
>Finally, can I get enough energy in the 433 - 453 range from an Innova
>70 Spectrum to do the job? If so, can this be done on a FACStar Plus
>without cross beam compensation?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Claude
>
>Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
> name="cantinc.vcf"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Description: Card for Claude Cantin
>Content-Disposition: attachment;
> filename="cantinc.vcf"
>
>Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:cantinc.vcf (TEXT/ttxt) (0002D378)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:41 EST