Re: G4 for FACSCalibur

From: David Chambers (davidc@ccmi.salk.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 11:54:05 EST

Next message: James Weaver 301-594-5879 FAX 301-594-3037: "Re[2]: G4 for FACSCalibur"
Previous message: Maciej Simm: "choice of BRIGHT antibodies/fluorochromes for monocytic IL-10 study?"
Maybe in reply to: Jeannine Navratil: "G4 for FACSCalibur"
Next in thread: Matthias Haury: "Re: G4 for FACSCalibur"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2000, Karim Vermaelen wrote:

> But the real shocking news now is this report by Keith Bahjat stating that
> Cellquest is not only non-optimized for the G4's vector processing, but was never
> optimized for the PowerPC architecture as well!

I don't speak for B-D, but on the CellQuest box is a large red starry sticker
saying "Accelerated for Power Macintosh".   Presumably this is not there by
accident? Naahhhh... :-)

-- David

Next message: James Weaver 301-594-5879 FAX 301-594-3037: "Re[2]: G4 for FACSCalibur"
Previous message: Maciej Simm: "choice of BRIGHT antibodies/fluorochromes for monocytic IL-10 study?"
Maybe in reply to: Jeannine Navratil: "G4 for FACSCalibur"
Next in thread: Matthias Haury: "Re: G4 for FACSCalibur"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:38 EST