fluorescence signal to noise ratio in EDTA vs. Na citrate

From: Annie Cheang (annie.cheang@pharm.utah.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 03 2000 - 00:03:28 EST


Hi List:

Hope this intelligent group can help!

I have been studying marker "T" on monocytes.  Originally I have been
collecting blood samples in EDTA, but found that untreated cells would have
a fluoresence intensity 5-8 times higher than the isotype control (which
did not make sense at all).   The treated cells  appropriately show a
higher fluorescence than untreated cells (fluorecence of treated: untreated
cells = 3:1).  That is, for example, isotype control of treated and
untreated cells has median fluorescence of 5, while untreated cells stained
with antibodies to marker "T" has median flurescence of 40, and treated
cells stained with antibodies to marker "T" has median fluorescence of
120.   After trying different concentrations / amount of antibodies, the
fluoresence intensity of untreated cells lowered a little bit but was still
high (about 3-5 times higher than the isotype control.)  Then I tried using
Na citrate as the anticoagulant, and now my untreated cells has a
flouresence intensity close to isotype control--however my treated cells'
fluorescence intensity also lowered, although still higher than untreated
cells (flurescence of treated : untreated cells = 2:1).  In this case, the
isotype flourescence is 5, the median flourescence of antibody "T" in
untreated cells is 6, and the treated cells' median fluoresence is 12.

  Does anybody know why this happens? And which anticoagulant should be used?

Thanks for your response!
Annie



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:37 EST