Re:TruCount vs Flow Count beads

From: Arnold Pizzey (a.pizzey@ucl.ac.uk)
Date: Mon May 22 2000 - 03:20:31 EST


At 09:21 18/05/00 -0400, you wrote:
>
>Hello All,
>
>I am in need of beads to use for absolute counts of cells which are
stained with
>a very bright fluorescein analog.  Does anyone have experience with either
>TruCounts or Flow Count beads with FITC-stained cells?  Have you had problems
>with compensation between The Fitc and Pe channels?  Any comments would be
>appreciated. Thanks
>
>Susan Dawes
>Procter & Gamble
>Miami Valley Labs
>dawes.sm@pg.com
>
>
>
>
Greetings Susan,

I have used a bead based system for the enumeration of cells, in the system
I use (see the archive for this thread), there are no compensation problems
at all because;

i)	The beads have markedly different scatter characteristics than the cells
to be counted (dendritic	cells) so they may be excluded from cell
phenotype analysis.

ii)    Where I have used this system with cell type whose scatter overlaps
the bead population, there is	generally no problems as the bead
fluorescence is several logs more intense than the cell		fluorescence and
is consequently well seperated from the distrubution of interest.


best regards

Arnold

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
	Arnold Richard Pizzey
	Department of Haematology
	Royal Free and University College London Medical School
	98 Chenies Mews
	London WC1E 6HX
	U.K

	voice:	+44 020-7679-6234
	Fax:	+44 020-7679-6222
	email:	a.pizzey@ucl.ac.uk
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:20 EST