Re: beckman coulter vs. becton dickinson

From: Beverly E. Barton (bartonbe@UMDNJ.EDU)
Date: Wed May 10 2000 - 07:21:13 EST


Hello Joe:
    I have trained on both, and I tell you that I find the BD to be
superior in ease of use, maintenance, software, etc.
Last year I attended the advanced flow course at Los Alaomos National Labs
and spoke with other flow operators from all over--most agreed they liked
BD more.  If you have   a more engineering "bend" than a scientific one (as
a flow operator), you'll like the Coulter more because it is more
"hands-on".  But I'm not an engineer, just an immunologist, so I didn't
like the Coulter design at all.  I currently have a FACScan (forerunner of
the FACSCalibur), and if I were to buy a sorter, it would be a Vantage.  I
didn't even look at Coulters when I bought my flow 2 years ago.
Regards,
Beverly

"Dr. Joseph C. Marini" wrote:

> Dear Flow'ers,
>
> My institute is about to purchase both a flow cytometer and a cell
> sorter. Both instruments will be purchased from the same company, as
> packaging them together gets us a better price.  The decision comes down
> to the Beckman Coulter Epics XL flow cytometer and  Epics Hypersort cell
> sorter versus the Becton Dickinson FacsCalibur flow cytometer and
> FacsVantage cell sorter.  I'd be interested to hear from you about the
> advantages/disadvantages of each and your recommendations.  In addition,
> could you comment on your experience with the "walkaway" carousels that
> are available for the flow cytometers?
>
> To spare everyone on the list, please email me privately.  I appreciate
> any and all comments.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joe




This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:19 EST