Fwd: RE: analysis of few cells

From: Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson (stetler@box-s.nih.gov)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 08:56:05 EST


	For the application being discussed you are correct and I do
feel better when there are 1000 events to study. However, in studying
lymphoid tumors using a multiparameter approach we can make an
accurate diagnosis with 100 cells- no problem. If a patient with
hairy cell leukemia, with surface lambda light chin expression,
bright CD22, bright CD11c, and negative kappa, if you identify 100
cells with this immunophenotype I all it diagnostic. You just can't
pick a number for all applications.

	Maryalice


>
>I do human Monocytes all day here, In most of my studies a 100ul wb blood
>sample can easily yield 1000 mono's in about 7-10 min from a lysed sample
>using a  FSC trigger.
>for a whole blood sample ( no lyse)  using a flour trigger instead of the
>FSC and dilute 1/20 (to reduce coincidence) and you can get 1000 in about 10
>min on LOW flow rate....
>
>A 100 event file will contain about 2% noise ( more if whole blood)..this
>drops after 300 events...statistically around 1000 is a safe bet.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bunny [mailto:bunny@cotleur.com]
>Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 5:51 PM
>To: cyto-inbox
>Subject: analysis of few cells
>
>
>
>Fellow Flowers:
>I wonder if I could gather some opinions on releveance as it relates to
>minimum numbers of events collected.
>I am assisting a lab in developing FACS analysis of PBMC's and monocytes
>in CSF. They informed me that when they run FACS, they are "lucky" to
>get 100 events.  I raised the questions of relevance, stating that those
>100 "events" could as easily contain some non-cell events as cell
>events. They insist their data is good becasue it compares somewhat (?)
>with a lab in Europe they are collaborating with. We have had many
>conversations on this.
>(I should mention- neither lab has direct FACS experience. They got all
>their protocols second hand, and just collect what they collect).
>Additional information: they are looking at chemokine expression
>(another difficult task) on these few cells- and I believe they are
>using the PBMC's to set up isotype controls. I doubt they even use comp
>controls.
>
>Please throw your 2cents my way. And if any of you do this type of
>analysis (few cells) with alternative techniques- I'd love to hear about it!
>Thanks-
>--
>
>
>
>Bunny
>
>
>
>
>
>
>*******************************************************
>Bunny Cotleur			  +*+	    Bunny  Cotleur
>Cleveland Clinic Foundation	  *+*	    2001 Lester RD
>Neurosciences	NC30		  +*+	    Valley City, OH  44280
>9500 Euclid Avenue		  *+*	    330-483-4800
>Cleveland, OH 44195		  +*+	    bunny@cotleur.com
>216-444-1164			  *+*
>cotleua@ccf.org		  +*+
>
>*******************************************************
>When you do something, you should burn yourself completely, like a good
>bonfire, leaving no trace of yourself.
>(Shunryu Suzuki)

Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson
Director Flow Cytometry Unit
Laboratory of Pathology, NCI, NIH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:16 EST