RE: HOW viable after high-speed sorting?

From: Sam Hou (sam.hou@jenner.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 07 2000 - 04:07:26 EST


Hi Cliff,
This is my first message to the list which I find a great asset to
beginners like me. I thought I'd share a couple of problems we've had.
We sort B220+ cells from a number of tissue cell suspensions and attempt
ELISPOT assays (measuring frequency of antibody secretors) directly
after sorting. We have found that sorting with a BD FACStar plus did not
seem to affect frequencies but Mo Flo sorting does (the cells do not
secrete). This may be due to the higher pressures involved with Mo Flo
sorting. We have tried a number of sheath fluids and sorting at "high"
or "low" speeds without success. We have never resolved this problem.
Sorting CD8+ T cells and then attempting direct CTL assays afterwards
does not seem to be affected. In a nutshell, function of sorted cells
can be affected but it is relative to the cell type sorted. I would love
to hear any comments by others on this problem.

Cheers,
Sam
**********************
Dr Sam Hou
Lung Immunology Group
Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research
Compton
Newbury
RG20 7NN
web site: www.jenner.ac.uk
Ph: 01635-577-924
Fax: 01635-577-901

-----Original Message-----
From: Cliff McArthur [mailto:cytocliff@netscape.net]
Sent: 06 March 2000 17:17
To: cyto-inbox
Subject: HOW viable after high-speed sorting?



Hi there, flow aficionados.

I know we've all addressed the post-sort viability (after high-speed
sorting)
question many times over.  What I am looking for is not "whether" but
"how
much," so to speak.  To that end, I'd like to ask the List if anyone
knows of
any published work that has addressed the question not of whether or not
cells
are viable after such sorting (we know they are, or can be) but "how"
viable,
that is, do they produce less cytokine or other product, proliferate a
little
more slowly, or survive for less time, etc., etc. under the same
conditions
versus "low-speed" sorted cells?  Shucks, references that just address
this
question, if it is not the primary objective of the work, would be great
to
have.

If anyone is willing to share their unpublished insights, I'd love to
hear
them as well.

Thank you very much,
Cliff McArthur
University of California at San Francisco
Departments of Medicine and Immunology/Microbiology
415-502-6860

____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:10 EST