RE: FACSCalibur Red Diode Laser Reliability

From: Kevin Holmes (KHOLMES@niaid.nih.gov)
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 09:00:52 EST


James,
Whereas the problems you see could certainly be due to bad luck with the
diode lasers, it is also possible that the mount for the red laser is giving
you problems.  We have noticed that the extra weight of the new TEC diode
laser makes it more vulnerable to becoming misaligned, resulting in loss of
signal and in loss of ability to compensate because the timing of FL4 pulse
is out of the time delay calibration window.  To distinguish the new
possibilities, you (or your service rep) can measure the output of the laser
(if lower than specifications, obviously it needs replacement); if the power
is OK, then check time delay calibration.  If time delay fails and the PMT
voltage required to meet the target channel is higher than normal, the laser
alignment may have drifted.  Time delay calibration is a sensitive
measurement of how the instrument is functioning, and even a small
misalignment of the laser will prevent it from passing.
Kevin


Kevin L. Holmes, Ph.D.
Chief, Flow Cytometry Section
Research Technologies Branch
Bldg. 7, Room 01
NIAID, NIH


-----Original Message-----
From: James F. George, Ph.D. [mailto:jgeorge@uab.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:26 PM
To: cyto-inbox
Subject: FACSCalibur Red Diode Laser Reliability

Greetings fellow flow cytometrists

We recently acquired a new dual laser facscalibur.  We have had some serious
problems with the stability of the red diode laser.  In two months, the
laser has been changed out three times and our fourth service call for the
same problem will commence tomorrow.  Typically, one will observe a decline
in sensitivity in fluorescence in channels that rely on the use of the diode
laser, accompanied by a large increase in the amount of compensation
required for those same fluorescence channels (I am being deliberately
non-specific here to accomodate those who do not have BD instruments, for
those facscalibur users, I am obviously talking about FL4, but this would
depend on the fluorochromes that were being used etc).	I went with BD
because my previous long experience with the highly reliable Facsscan and
the fact that I really needed two lasers.  Unfortunately, the other laser is
not useful if it is unreliable.

Have others experienced this problem, particularly since BD switched
suppliers for the diode laser?

This is making me crazy.  Any info you have on this would be useful.  I am
working with BD on this (upper management has been pretty responsive), but
currently I have not seen a permanent solution to the problem.

-James



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:58:08 EST