Re: RBC surface area, volume, and topology

From: Howard Shapiro (hms@shapirolab.com)
Date: Thu Jun 29 2000 - 19:07:16 EST


Julie Pribyl writes-

Does anyone have insight into the problem below from a summer student using
flow cytometry?

Our lab is currently researching how high cholesterol levels affect the
diffusion of oxygen
through red blood cells.  My job for the summer will be trying to find a
way to calculate an average surface area, average volume, and topology of
the red blood cells.  Will FSC and SSC data provide enough information?

It is essentially impossible to get the information from FSC and SSC.

Flow cytometric measurements of light scattering at two angles are used to
derive fairly accurate values for red cell volume in the clinical
hetamology counters made by Bayer (formerly Technicon).  However, the red
cells must be subjected to a chemical treatment which transforms them from
their native biconcave disc shape to spheres without changing volume (the
process is called isovolumetric sphering) in order to prevent the normal
asymmetry of the cells from producing spurious scatter measurement
values.  Thus, while the volume can be measured, the topology is
lost.  Even then, the volume measurement is only possible because rigorous
standardization and calibration procedures have been developed, and we
don't have anything like that for FSC and SSC (although some work has been
done on FSC and bacterial volumes).  It's easy to collect a lot of FSC and
SSC values from cells under different conditions, and hard to derive
reliable quantitative information from them, which doesn't necessarily stop
people from publishing.

This is a really, really hard problem.  Solving it is well beyond what
could or should be expected from a summer student; it could occupy several
Ph.D. students for a number of years.  I would think the grosser changes
might best be picked up by a combination of volume measurements using a
hematology counter and scanning EM combined with image analysis.

-Howard



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:55:55 EST